Porto very reliant on player sales

Porto swung from a pre-tax €22m profit to a €47m loss, a deterioration of €69m, despite revenue rising €22m (15%) from €144m to €166m, which reflected a return to normality after three years impacted by the global pandemic. The main reason for the worsening of the bottom line was a steep reduction in profit from player sales, which slumped €70m (83%) from €84m to €14m.

Porto’s revenue growth was driven by more progress in the Champions League which led to broadcasting increasing €15m (17%) from €90m to €105m. Commercial rose €5m (11%) from €43m to €48m, while match day was up €2.5m (23%) from €11.0m to €13.5m, due to the lifting of all COVID restrictions.

In contrast to Porto’s reported €47m loss before tax, the other leading Portuguese clubs were all profitable in 2022/23, with Sporting leading the way with €26m, followed by Benfica €21m and Braga €2m.

As we have seen, Porto’s business model is very reliant on player sales, as they have earned an impressive €438m in the last decade, including €202m in the last 5 years. Profits will return to normal levels in 2022/23 after the €60m sale of Otavio to Saudi Arabian club Al-Nassr this summer.

Porto have earned an impressive €273m from European competitions in the last 5 years, rivals just ahead of Benfica’s €256m. Both clubs enjoyed a substantial advantage over all other Portuguese clubs, e.g. Sporting €108m and Braga €48m.

Porto’s wage bill rose €12m (15%) from €83m to €95m, mainly due to higher bonuses for more progress in the Champions League. This is a new club record, though is only 4% more than the €92m paid four years ago. Porto’s wages are much lower than top clubs in the major leagues, e.g. PSG’s €729min in 2021/22 was nearly nine times as much as their €82m, while even West Ham paid almost twice as much with €160m. This makes it fairly inevitable that their young talent will move abroad sooner or later.

Porto’s gross financial debt increased from €280m to €302m, mainly due to a €55m bond offering in June 2023. The year-end balance comprised other loans €175m (factoring €152m and commercial paper €23m), bonds €125m and bank loans €2m. Porto’s debt is at an all-time high of €302m, and is considerably more than its rivals: Benfica €170m, Sporting €138m and Braga €7m. In fact, it’s almost as much as those three clubs put together.

Porto’s ability to punch above their weight in Europe has been impressive, particularly given their relatively low revenue, but it should be acknowledged that their business model is very reliant on two important factors: (a) qualification for the Champions League;(b) large gains from player sales.

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog