Skip to main content

The Glazer stewardship of United

Why are many United supporters eager for the Glazer family to sell up? You only need to look at the debt amassed, the interest paid out, the dividends disbursed and the money spent in the transfer market to find the answers to that question.

United’s most recent set of accounts dated up until the third quarter of 2022-23 put the club’s gross debt at £725m.  That is the highest it has been since 2010 when the Glazers carried out a major restructuring of the club’s finances in order to bring the cost of their borrowing under control, and is up from £636m at the end of the 2021-22 season.  That increase is largely due to United borrowing another £100m last season as a drawdown from their revolving credit facility.

As the majority of United’s debt is denominated in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the exchange rate also affect how it is reported when converted to British pounds sterling.

The dollar’s strength against the pound means United’s $650m principal debt was worth £521m at the end of March compared to £489m at the same time last year, even though the actual amount of money borrowed was unchanged.

Before the Covid-19 pandemic hit, United had healthy cash reserves of £308m. That mountain of cash quickly became a molehill, falling to £52m as the club began to grapple with the realities of operating under lockdown and playing behind closed doors.  United were disproportionately affected by the closure of stadiums due to Old Trafford’s size, meaning larger losses of matchday revenue than their Premier League rivals.

United’s interest payments have remained at a relatively consistent level since 2016, generally costing around £20m each season.  However, 2022-23’s third-quarter results reported £25.1m paid out in interest — the most in eight years, with still another quarter to go. When the full-year accounts arrive, United will have paid more in interest last season than in any since the 2014-15 campaign.

In total, the club have paid around £747m in interest payments since the 2005 takeover. That amount will keep climbing for as long as United owe money — all because the ownership needed to borrow to buy the club in the first place.

United began regularly paying out dividends seven years ago and have steadily rewarded shareholders with an average payment of £22m each season — typically with one instalment in January, then another in June.   Including a one-off £10m payment at the turn of the last decade, the club have paid out a total of £166m in dividends since the 2005 takeover. The vast majority of this money is paid to the Glazer family themselves — given their 69 per cent shareholding in the club, with the other 31 per cent held by multiple other stakeholders.

Value for money?

The Glazers have overseen a total outlay of £2.1bn on players since their takeover, of which £1.7bn has come over the past decade — enough to rival the Premier League’s other big spenders Manchester City and Chelsea.  Yet whereas City and Chelsea have won eight Premier League titles between them over the past 10 seasons, United have not been crowned champions once.   That, perhaps more than anything else, calls into question the Glazers’ stewardship of the club.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/