Inter make financial progress

Inter’s pre-tax loss has significantly fallen from €137m to €77m, thanks to what the club described as “financial rebalancing”. This referred to a combination of increasing revenue, which rose €71m (22%) from €325m to €396m, and reducing costs, which were cut by €54m (10%).

The improvement was further boosted by net interest payable dropping by €11m (23%) from €48m to €37m, though it’s worth noting that this is still a huge annual interest burden, which has effectively doubled Inter’s loss from €40m to €77m.

So the club took many steps in the right direction, which were more than enough to offset the substantial €77m decrease in profit on player sales from €105m to €28m.

Success on the pitch contributed to revenue growth in both match day, which more than doubled from €40m to a new Italian record of €82m, and broadcasting, up €41m (26%) from €156m to €197m. Player loans and other income from player management nearly tripled from €4m to €11m. However, commercial fell €19m (15%) from €126m to €107m, mainly due to non-payment of the shirt sponsorship.

Despite the big improvement, the harsh reality is that Inter still posted a substantial €85m net loss in 2022/23. To place that into perspective, it has only been “beaten” by Juventus’ €124m to date (though prolific loss-makers Roma are yet to publish their accounts for last season).

That said, Inter have come a long way since their massive €246m loss in 2020/21, which gave them the unwanted honour of Italy’s record loss, just ahead of Juventus €239m and Roma €219m (both in 2021/22).

To further place Inter’s poor financial performance into context, their pre-tax losses over the three seasons up to 2021/22 were among the highest in Europe with their €473m only surpassed by Barcelona €840m (excluding their famous economic levers), PSG €725m and Juventus €544m.

Inter have lost an amazing €781m in the last 10 years (pre-tax), including €617m in the seven years under Suning’s control.

Following the reduction last year, this season player trading will bounce back with profit estimated as around €70m, including André Onana’s big money move to Manchester United (€50m fee), Marcelo Brozovic to Al-Nassr (€18m) and Robin Gosens to Union Berlin (€13m).

Inter’s Europe TV money was €37m more than the prior season’s €63m when they only reached the last 16. Each stage reached in 2022/23 earned them another large slice of cash: quarter-final €10.6m, semi-final €12.5m and final €15.5m. Interestingly, winning the trophy would only have been worth an additional €4.5m. Europe TV money has been extremely important for Inter, earning them an impressive €325m in the last five years. This is the second highest among Italian clubs, but it is a fair bit lower than Juventus’ €404m. On the other hand, it is around €100m more than Napoli €228m and is twice as much as Milan €162m.

Inter‘s gross debt increased from €489m to a club record €538m, compromising €409m bonds and €129m shareholder loans (including accrued interest). The hefty debt means that Inter ‘s annual net interest payable is now a chunky €37m, mainly €29m on the bond and €6m on shareholder loans, though this has fallen from the prior year’s €48m, primarily due to lower costs associated with transfers factoring.

Inter’s owners Suning are in a difficult situation, as they need to repay a loan of around €350m to American asset management firm Oaktree Capital by May next year. If they don’t make the payment, then they could lose ownership of the club to Oaktree, which would ironically be pretty much what happened when Elliott took over Milan in 2017.

We should applaud the improvement in Inter’s finances, including growing operating revenue to record levels, while also cutting the wage bill. At the same time, we have to acknowledge that they still posted a large loss and have built up significant debt, even after reaching the Champions League final.

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion. Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs. An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog