Skip to main content

Norwich at a crossroads

After many years under the guidance of Delia Smith and Michael Wynn Jones, the Norwich City are increasingly influenced by Michael Attanasio, the owner of American baseball team Milwaukee Brewers.

He first purchased a minority stake from former director Michael Foulger last year, but the club has recently ratified the acquisition of many more shares, bringing his shareholding to the same 40% level as Smith and her husband.

However, it’s clear that the fans are very unhappy, as epitomised by a very blunt statement from the Canaries Trust.

“The completion of the legal process with Mark Attanasio seems to finally be approaching a conclusion, but, from an outside perspective there’s no overall sense of leadership, or direction, and supporters are desperate for some sense of a vision that we can all buy into and move forward together.

Norwich City’s pre-tax loss widened from £24m to £27m, as revenue dropped £58m (43%) from the club record £134m to £76m following relegation to the Championship. This was partly offset by profit from player sales increasing from zero to £4m.   Norwich City’s pre-tax loss widened from £24m to £27m, as revenue dropped £58m (43%) from the club record £134m to £76m following relegation to the Championship. This was partly offset by profit from player sales increasing from zero to £4m.

The main driver of Norwich’s £58m revenue decrease was broadcasting, which more than halved in the Championship, falling by £53m from £102m to £49m.

Norwich are the only Championship club that has to date published accounts for 2022/3, but their £27m pre-tax loss is clearly on the high side for the division, looking at other clubs’ results from the previous season.

Over the years, Norwich have looked to adopt a sustainable approach, making £31m profits in the decade up to 2021. However, there has been a fairly dramatic twist in their model in the last two years, when they lost £51m, more than wiping out those surpluses.

However, the Norwich business model is fairly dependent on player sales. They have made an impressive £163m profit in the last ten years, but their performance has not been consistent, as the majority of the gains came in only two seasons: £60m in 2020/21 and £48m in 2017/18.

Norwich’s revenue was boosted by a parachute payment, which was worth an estimated £44m last season. In total, they have received £186m such payments since 2015, having been relegated four times in that period.

Norwich attracted the third highest crowd in the Championship in 2022/23, only behind Sunderland 38,480 and Sheffield United 28,746. The club sold out its season tickets quota, showing “the incredible support of our fans”.

Norwich’s £17.0m commercial income is the highest in the Championship, ahead of Stoke City £16.6m, and Bristol City £15.8m (2021/22 figures), though they may be overtaken by Sunderland when they publish their 2022/23 accounts.

Norwich’s wage bill more than halved following relegation, falling £62m (52%) from the club record £118m to £56m. This was £11m lower than the last time they were in the Championship two years before, but that had been inflated by a promotion bonus. Player contracts include relegation clauses of up to 60%.

The board tried to buck the cycle of promotion followed by relegation by spending a lot more than it usually does in the last two years (and also not selling players to balance the books), but this bold plan did not work. In fact, it has only increased debt and interest payments.

As Stuart Webber said with some understatement, “The last two seasons have proven difficult, and our performances on the pitch haven’t been what we wanted.”

It’s too early to say whether the recent changes off the pitch will improve Norwich’s future prospects, but the present strife would not be what Attanasio signed up for when he invested in the club.

The Canaries’ challenge will be even harder if they do not secure promotion this season, as they would then have to compete without the advantage of parachute payments.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/