Real Madrid out performed most clubs in COVID era

Real Madrid’s pre-tax profit in 2022/23 reduced from €20m to €9m, even though revenue shot up €121m (17%) from €722m to a club record of €843m, which comfortably surpassed the pre-pandemic €757m peak, and profit from player sales increased from €62m to €71m.

However, all of these improvements were offset by the fact that there was no repeat of the previous year’s €316m capital gain from Sixth Street/Legends.

Marketing increased €40m (14%) from €290m to €330m, while broadcasting rose €8m (4%) from €179m to €187m and other income more than quadrupled from €9m to €39m. Real Madrid earned €118m for reaching the Champions League, semi-finals in 2022/23, which was €16m less than the prior season’s €134m, when they were the winners.

Real Madrid’s profit from player sales increased from €62m to €71m (€104m gains less €33m losses), mainly thanks to the sale of Casemiro to Manchester United. A number of players left on free transfers, including Gareth Bale, Luka Jovic, Isco and Marcelo. This is the highest player trading profit in La Liga to date, a fair way ahead of Sevilla’s €43m in 2021/22. This was in stark contrast to Barcelona’s €42m net loss.

This result means that Real Madrid have remained in profit over the last four years, though their surpluses were much higher before COVID struck. In fact, they have generated profits every year since 2003 and have also budgeted a €10m surplus for this season.

Real Madrid have become more reliant on player sales, making an impressive €439m from this activity in the five years up to 2023, though the average €66m in the last two years was a lot lower than the €102m average in the preceding three years.

The club said that it had become more difficult to carry out significant player sales, both because of the huge losses incurred by most European clubs due to COVID and because of the evolution of the dynamics of the transfer market itself, with an increasing number of players finishing their contracts without being transferred.

Real Madrid’s revenue remains higher than Barcelona, as has been the case for the last three years, with their €843m giving them a €37m advantage over their great rivals. The last time the roles were reversed was back in 2018/19, when Barca were €84m ahead, so there has been a €121m revenue swing since then.

Real Madrid’s €800 stadium loan is made up of two elements: €575m at 2.5% and €225m at 1.53%. The club did well to secure the funding at such an attractive interest rate, which averages out at 2.23%. Adding €159m invoices payable and a €59m stadium adjustment gives the €1,018m gross debt.

It is clear that Real Madrid performed better than most clubs in the COVID era, though they obviously benefited from the major Sixth Street/Legends deal in 2021/22.

The good news is that they still managed to deliver a profit last season even without the help of any economic levers, thanks to a combination of impressive revenue growth and some good cost containment (relatively speaking).

Looking further ahead, the Bernabéu stadium development will represent a major challenge, building up sizeable debt, but it also an opportunity to generate much more money, taking the club close to the elusive €1 bln revenue barrier.

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog