Skip to main content

Well-considered plan underpins Ipswich's rise

For the most part, their 17 years in the second tier Ipswich Town felt like they were running to stand still, as the financial disparity with the parachute clubs continued to widen.  In fact, things got worse before they got better, as the Tractor Boys were relegated in 2019 to League One, where they languished for four seasons before a dramatic change in their fortunes.

The transformation was effected under the new owners, who purchased the club in April 2021 for a reported £40m. As a result, Ipswich Town became majority owned by the appropriately named Gamechanger 20 Limited, though the ultimate owner is a US investment firm, ORG.

The new ownership group has certainly put its money where its mouth is to date, investing a lot into the squad and the club’s infrastructure. However, this looks like its part of a well thought-out plan, as shown by some astute recruitment. McKenna is the obvious jewel in the crown, but they also brought in former Bristol City chief executive, Mark Ashton, to lead operations off the pitch.

Their view was that Ipswich represented an excellent investment opportunity, as ORG chief executive Ed Schwartz explained, “Our view is that we've bought, at a lower value, an asset that has potential and history. Ipswich really was the perfect scenario for us.”

The club received additional funding in March this year, as Bright Path Sports Partners, a US private equity firm which specialises in professional sports franchises, invested £105m for a 40% minority stake. This was described as “an exciting step which will further secure the club’s future”.

Following this transaction, ORG’s stake has reduced to around 50%, while Bright Path now has 40% with the remaining 10% allocated to smaller investors, split between 5% for three businessmen (Brett Johnson, Berke Bakay and Mark Detmer) and 5% for Marcus Evans.

They paid the price of success in 2022/23, as the pre-tax loss widened from £12.6m to £18.2m, despite revenue rising by a very impressive 51% (£7.4m) from £14.4m to £21.8m.  All three revenue streams were higher, though the largest increase was in commercial, which shot up £4.2m (74%) from £5.7m to £9.9m. There was also good growth in match day, up £2.3m (40%) from £5.7m to £8.0m, and broadcasting, up £0.8m (27%) from £3.1m to £3.9m.

Ipswich made less than £11m from player sales during their 4-year stay in League One, averaging just £2.7m a season. In the last decade, they have only achieved double digit profits once, which was back in 2014/15 when they made £12m, mainly from the sales of Tyrone Mings to Bournemouth and Aaron Cresswell to West Ham.

The Swiss Ramble estimates  that Ipswich would have generated around £31m in the Championship, based on higher crowds, a 6% ticket price increase and assuming 20% growth in commercial income.  Ipswich’s revenue will be even higher next season in the top flight. Looking at the three clubs most recently promoted to the Premier League, their revenue increased by over £100m on average, more than tripling in the process.

Even if Ipswich were to finish last they would still earn more than £140m, which is mainly driven by the lucrative TV deal in the top flight, but also assumes a further increase in attendances, the announced 8% ticket price increase, plus a doubling in commercial revenue.

Wages have grown by nearly 50% (£6.4m) from £13.4m in the last two years, though part of this increase will have been down to a promotion bonus, while there has also been much investment support staff off the pitch.

Town spent £8.0m on player purchases in 2022/23, which might not sound like much, but was an enormous amount for League One with the next highest outlay being only £1.5m by Portsmouth.

The new owners have certainly put their hands in their pockets, as they have provided around £70m of funding since their arrival, including £29.5m in 2022/23 and an estimated £21m in 2023/24. The amount last season is based on the £15m mentioned in a note in the accounts (relating to events after year-end) plus £6m from a filing to Companies House.  That’s an average of £17.4m a year, which is ten times as much as Evans provided in the last six years of his tenure, though in fairness this was a lot lower than his initial contribution.

It does feel like this is part of a well-considered plan, as the owners have invested as much in the club’s infrastructure as the playing squad, while they clearly have one eye on FFP compliance. It’s also a good sign that funding has come in the form of equity injections.

Perhaps the most encouraging thing is that that they managed to hang on to Kieran McKenna, which Ashton described as “the best signing the club will make this summer”.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Lau on the ropes

Financial challenges are building up for Guichan Lau whose company WBA Holdings owns 66 per cent of West Bromwich Albion.   His company's accounts show that it is in default on a £2 million from a West Midlands heating company called Warmfront Holdings. Warmfront has agreed to take no action to reclaim the loan and interest until February next year.  Given a punitive rate of interest of 5 per cent a month, the amount outstanding will then be around £4 million. Lai has missed three deadlines to repay a loan from the Baggies to his Hong Kong company Wisdom Smart Corporation.  [sic]  Meanwhile the club have a £20m loan from MSD UK holdings at an annual interest rate of 13.8 per cent.