Skip to main content

Still a long way to go for finances for Juve

Juventus’ pre-tax loss significantly increased in 2023/24 from €117m to €196m (€199m after tax), which the club said was “heavily influenced by the non-participation in UEFA competitions”, as well as €36m of non-recurring costs.  Revenue fell €89m (19%) from €461m to €372m, while profit on player sales more than halved from €47m to €22m.

The main driver for the steep revenue decrease was broadcasting, which dropped €57m (37%) from €157m to €100m. entirely due to the lack of European TV money.

The other revenue streams were also impacted by not playing in Europe, as ticket sales fell €4m (6%) from €62m to €58m, while commercial decreased €16m (7%) from €219m to €203m.

Unsurprisingly, Juventus’ €196m pre-tax loss was the worst result in Serie A last season: Not all clubs have published their accounts for last season, but for some perspective it was almost twice as much as the largest loss in 2022/23, namely Roma’s €99m.

The last time that Juventus posted a profit was back in 2016/17, so they have now lost money seven years in succession. In that period, they have lost €894m before tax, including more than three-quarters of a billion Euros in the last four years alone.

The club has advised that it expects a “significant improvement” this season in the range of break-even, though this would depend on “the second phase of the 2024/25 transfer campaign”, implying that there will be further player departures in the January window.

This is part of a strategic plan that should show “progressive improvement”, leading to a “positive net result in 2026/27”, though this is based on certain sporting successes, i.e. qualifying for the Champions League.

The importance of player trading to the Juventus business model is clearly illustrated by the steep reduction in club’s bottom line in the last four years, when they only averaged an annual gain of €32m. This was €100m lower than the €132m in the preceding 4-year period.

The good news is that the club said it had already made €64m this season (with the January window still to come), mainly from the sales of Matias Soulé to Roma (€22m profit) and Dean Huijsen to Bournemouth (€13m).

Juve’s average attendance of 39,416 in 2023/24 was only sixth highest in Serie A, over 30,000 below Inter 72,838 and Milan 69,461. Their crowds were also less than Roma 62,970, Napoli 46,967 and Lazio 44,142.

One other piece of bad news for Juventus is the expiry of the Jeep shirt sponsorship, worth €45m with bonuses, at the end of last season. The club is currently playing with the “Save The Children” logo on the front of their shirt until they can find a new main sponsor.

Juventus’ wages decreased for the third year in a row, falling by €18m (6%) from €282m to €264m, the lowest since 2017/18.  Juve’s wage bill really took off the season after that when they signed Cristiano Ronaldo. The club has been paying the price ever since, as this move effectively destroyed the previous good husbandry of their finances.

One of the root causes of Juve’s financial difficulties is the amount they have splashed out in the transfer market, which can be seen from a comparison with other leading clubs. In the five years up to 2022/23, they had the second highest gross spend in Europe with €1.1 bln, only surpassed by Chelsea.

Juve’s €279m gross debt is the third highest in Italy, though a lot smaller than Inter €538m and Roma €497m. Loans were originally take out for stadium development, but were then increasingly been used to finance investment in the squad.

Juventus have been very reliant on capital injections from their owners.  In fact, the €200m provided last season is the third time that the club has had to go to the shareholders for cash recently after €300m in 2019/20 and €400m in 2021/22, which means a total of €900m in just five years (equivalent to €889m after fees are deducted).

There’s no doubt that this is an awful set of financial results, as Juventus were hit hard by the lack of European competition and lower player sales, both of which have been absolutely crucial to the club’s business model.

However, there are a few signs of encouragement, as the board now appears to be much more focused on financial sustainability, though success on the pitch is imperative for the strategic plan to succeed.

As a minimum, Juve need to qualify for the Champions League, though this should definitely be achievable with their resources.

While they are clearly reducing the financial excesses of the past few years, though there’s still a long way to go before they can declare victory.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...