Skip to main content

Villa's search for revenue

It was in early 2024 that The Athletic was told of Aston Villa’s desire to pursue stadium naming rights. Chris Heck, the club’s president of business operations at the time, led discussions among staff to find a lucrative, big-brand sponsorship to rename Villa Park.

Many clubs have raised significant revenue this way, including Arsenal with the Emirates Stadium, Manchester City’s Etihad Stadium or, further away, Barcelona’s Spotify Camp Nou. Heck and his team cast the net far and wide, discussing worldwide brands, but a suitable partner has not been found.

Stadium naming rights would, undoubtedly, have the greatest commercial impact, far exceeding any additional money brought in through the hike in ticket prices at the start of the 2024-25 campaign or the upcoming season’s rise of five per cent.

Would supporters sacrifice tradition and be prepared to change Villa Park’s name in exchange for PSR to be less of a yearly issue?

Manager Unai Emery has driven Villa’s on-pitch success, making him the club’s key revenue driver. Villa’s fourth-place finish in the 2023-24 season generated £162.4m in Premier League prize money and reaching the quarter-finals of the Champions League in 2024-25 amassed more than £70m. This ensured Villa topped £300m in income for the first time. 

Qualifying for Europe’s elite competition allowed Villa to be more ambitious during commercial negotiations. Sources who shared existing knowledge of recent deals, speaking on condition of anonymity to protect relationships, told The Athletic that last season’s agreements included ‘kickers’. This means the club receives additional revenue every time they qualify for the Champions League, unlocking extra sponsorship money. 

Villa aspire to compete with Europe’s biggest clubs but are yet to tap into the commercial markets they benefit from. They remain without a sponsor for their training kit and training ground, Bodymoor Heath.

Supporters widely accept that Villa Park, though retaining its history, must be redeveloped. There were 30,000 people on the season ticket waiting list in 2023 and the stadium’s capacity of 42,000 is no longer suitable to match demand. There is also natural decay in parts of the ground, such as the turnstiles and concourses. There is an understanding that certain areas of Villa Park are too small and sometimes difficult to steward.

The club announced they would restart plans to build a 50,000-seater stadium in time for Euro 2028, a tournament where Villa Park will host matches. Villa and the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) face logistical and financial issues but should the proposal be put into action, gate receipts will considerably boost revenue.

Villa are far removed from the traditional ‘Big Six’ for matchday revenue and, more gallingly, trail West Ham United — which boasts a ground that holds 20,000 more spectators — and Newcastle United, who have 10,000 more seats, by £16.6m and £22.1m respectively. 

A redeveloped and expanded Villa Park may be celebrated with new naming rights. But preserving Villa’s traditions will surely be of equal, if not more, importance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...