Skip to main content

How much is a defender worth?

That question is posed by the £75m signing of Virgil van Dijk by Liverpool from Southampton. It is believed that he will be paid £180,000 a week.

Traditionally, it is strikers who have commanded the big transfer fees. To win matches you have to score goals. Moreover, in terms of attracting sponsors, a marquee signing of a striker gives a club a high profile.

However, to win matches you also have to avoid conceding too many goals and defensive fragility has been Liverpool's problem. One player won't solve that, but he will provide much needed leadership.

Southampton tend to end up selling their best players, usually at a good profit. That gives the club financial stability, even if it puts paid to any hopes of pushing on to the next level. The risk for a solid mid-table club is getting sucked into a relegation battle, and it is a risk that the Saints face at the moment.

The price of defenders has been going up over time. In 1998 Jap Stam commanded £10.6m when he went from PSV to Manchester United. Rio Ferdinand cost £18m when he went from West Ham to Leeds and £12m more when he was transferred to Manchester United two years later.

By 2014 David Luiz could fetch £50m when he moved from Chelsea to PSG. Three years later Kyle Walker cost £54m when he moved from Tottenham to Manchester City. The sale of van Dijk represents a 39 per cent increase on that figure.

His transfer has brought a windfall for Celtic who were canny enough to include a 10 per cent sell on clause when he moved to Southampton. The £7m they will receive is more than double the prize money awarded to them for winning the Scottish championship last season which says something about the financial state of Scottish football: Celtic windfall

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/