Skip to main content

Mayor takes charge of Olympic Stadium

Mayor of London Sadiq Khan has taken charge of the Olympic Stadium after a report found that it was losing more than £20m a year. Sadiq Khan criticised his predecessor, Boris Johnson, claiming that he had 'panicked' and allowed the taxpayer to foot the £300m bill to convert the venue into a football stadium for West Ham United. The conversion has cost £113m more than estimated and the stadium is forecast to lose £24m in 2017-18.

Under the deal struck by Mr Johnson when he was mayor West Ham pays £2.5m a year as part of a 99-year lease, which is reduced to £1.25m if they are relegated from the Premier League. The costs of converting the stadium were largely borne by the taxpayer with the club contributing £15m. Stewarding and policing costs, along with such items as cleaners, turnstile operators, goalposts and corner flags are picked up by the publicly owned operator E20. The review commissioned by the mayor found that since that deal was signed, policing and stewarding costs have 'increased notably'.

The London Borough of Newham has withdrawn from the E20 partnership. Mr Khan would like to renegotiate the deal with West Ham, but the club insists that it is 'legally watertight.'

A thorough West Ham fan perspective on developments can be found here. It takes the view that West Ham will have to pay more to use the stadium: A dreadful mess

Comments

  1. Cant have it both ways either coe wanted to keep athletics and being used maybe twice a year and costing a fortune or let west ham buy the stadium and have it for football only which should have been the answer but coe wanted it both ways so were left with this mess through coe boris and nobody looking ahead after the olympics. Not hammers fault as much as i dont like the board you cant blame them for getting the cheapest option they are after all just businessmen and woman.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/