Skip to main content

Mourinho says United need to spend more

José Mourinho said that Manchester United would have to spend more money to build a team capable of winning the Premier League after yesterday's draw with Burnley. When it was put to him that he had spent nearly £300m on players since joining United at the start of last season, he said: 'It is not enough. City are buying full backs for the price of strikers.'

Kieran Maguire of the PriceofFootball has dismissed Mourinho's claims as 'fake news'. He points out that United's spend on both players and wages has been ahead of City over the last five years. The wage bill went up by 12.2 per cent in the first quarter of 2017/18.

In the first year of the Premier League in 1992 Manchester United and Arsenal had the same wage bills. Since then United have paid out £413m more and their wage bill has increased by 4,220 per cent.

Tony Cascarino, writing in The Times takes a different view. He argues that United do not have many world class players: 'They have lots of what I would call very good players, in the seven or eight out of ten category.' If Cascarino is right, it implies that United have not bought well or, that for some reason, players have not realised their potential.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Unknown27 December 2017 at 02:26

    why cant he develop those he bought first.....i smell his exit.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow
Post a Comment
Read more

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is
Post a Comment
Read more

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/
Post a Comment
Read more