The Manchester United brand

The accounts of Red Football, the parent company of Manchester United, for 2016-17 have just been published. They make fascinating reading, not just in terms of the club itself, but as an illustration of how a major football club is seen as a brand to be marketed.

Among the stated objectives is 'treating fans as customers'. Many fans object to this as they see it as downgrading their identification with the club so that they become the mere object of marketing ploys. Elsewhere they are referred to as 'the follower base' which reflects the fact that many of them never come to Old Trafford. Another objective is 'leveraging the global brand'. Leading the list of key business risks is 'maintaining and enhancing our brand and reputation'. 'The performance and popularity of our first team' is listed third.

The report states, 'To be successful in the future we must preserve, grow and leverage the value of our brand across all revenue streams. Unfavourable publicity regarding the first team's performance or their behaviour off the field, our ability to attract and retain certain players ... could affect our brand and reputation. Failure to respond effectively to negative publicity could also further erode our brand and reputation. In addition, events in the football industry as a whole, even if unrelated to us, could negatively affect our brand and reputation.'

However, one cannot deny that the approach has been financially successful. Group revenues for the year were up from £515.3m to £581.2m, an increase of over 11 per cent. Profit before tax for the year was up from £48.9m to £55.6m. Net debt was down from £261.1m to £213.6m.

A number of playing performance indicators were not achieved. The aim was to finish at least 3rd in the Premier League and the club finished 6th. The club aimed to be in the last 16 of the Champions League, but finished up participating in the Europa League (which it won). It hoped to be in the last eight of the FA Cup, but exited at the 6th round.

However, commercial revenue (excluding shirt sponsorship) was up 1.7 per cent. Customer relationship management fan records were up by 8.2 per cent.

Commercial income at £275.4m accounts for 47 per cent of all revenue. Broadcasting revenue accounted for 33 per cent. Matchday revenue accounted for 19 per cent.

Three sources accounted for more than 10 per cent of revenue. The Premier League accounted for £147.8m, up from just under £100m, an increase of nearly 50 per cent. The deal with Adidas produced £79.2m and £59.4m came from General Motors (Chrevrolet).

Total wages and salaries cost amounted to 45 per cent of revenue, below the 50 per cent level recommended by Deloitte. Total staff were 865, of whom 74 were players and 136 were technical and coaching. Key management compensation amounted to £12.3m.

Brexit

It is admitted that Brexit 'may adversely affect our operations and financial results.' The club's ability to compete with the top clubs in Europe could be affected. Three paragraphs are devoted to this topic. The principal concerns identified are:

Stability of global financial markets and reduction in market liquidity
Decreased foreign investment in the UK
Depressed economic activity
Restricted access to capital
Greater restrictions on the movement of players between the UK and EU
Increased regulatory complexities

However, these effects could be diminished by acceptable withdrawal terms.

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion. Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs. An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog