Skip to main content

The defensive stance of the 'other fourteen'

There was an interesting piece of analysis on Match of the Day Two last night comparing the top six clubs in the Premier League with the 'other fourteen'. For these purposes, Burnley were not treated as one of the 'top six', but as temporary guests.

It turns out that the other fourteen have seen a decline in goals scored and shots on goal. On average they are scoring about one goal a game. This implies a much more defensive style of play. (Thanks to Plumstead Emirates for telling me that 2.62 goals per game have been scored in the Premier League this season compared with 2.8 last season).

This is also reflected in the reliance on 'retreads' when it is thought there is a need for a change of manager such as Alan Pardew at West Bromwich Albion. Safety first is the motto.

The financial penalties of relegation are now huge. Moreover, for the many foreign owners relegation means that they lose the prestige and the global profile offered by the Premier League.

Of course, if you are one of the other fourteen, the best you can usually hope for is 'midtable mediocrity' and heading the chasing pack. Think Southampton. But if you appear to be a secure midtable club the threat of a relegation battle is never far away, think Stoke City.

At the moment just nine points separates Huddersfield in 11th and bottom club Swansea City. However, with Manchester City soaring away, perhaps the interest in this year's Premier League will reside in the relegation battle.

For fans scoring goals is the high point of any game and 'parking the bus' doesn't offer much in the way of entertainment for television viewers. The very best teams are, of course, able to unlock defences. The underlying issue here is the tension between the finances that 'the product' generates and the attractiveness of the product itself.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/