Skip to main content

The World Cup and Fifa finances

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has taken a look at FIFA’s accounts and how important the World Cup is to their finances.

In 2017 Fifa made a $189m loss before interest and tax, though this was $202m lower than 2016 and $300m better than budget. Revenue of $734m beat budget by $120m, while $923m expenses were $180m below budget. FIFA said this was “a successful year for all key financial parameters”.

It is important to note that FIFA operates in a four year cycle with the World Cup being the “crowning event” in the fourth year and the main source of income. Thus, the majority of revenue is shown in the fourth year, whereas football development is equally spread over all years of the cycle.So, FIFA has reported deficits in last 3 years (2015 $117m, 2016 $391m & 2017 $189m), while 2018 would be a $797m surplus to achieve the $100m profit budgeted for the four-year cycle. However, the recent congress estimated revenue would be $6.1 bn, leading to a surplus over $0.5 bn.

To give an idea of the World Cup’s importance, the last three tournaments delivered substantial profits: Germany $1.6 bn, South Africa $2.4 bn & Brazil $2.6 bn. Russia is estimated to generate $3.4 bn, while Qatar could be as high as $4.5 bn (due to much lower costs for smaller location).

2018 World Cup prize money of $400m is $42m (12%) higher than 2014 $358m. Winner receives $38m, but each participant is guaranteed a minimum $9.5m ($8m prize money plus $1.5m preparation). This will be up a further 10% to $440m in Qatar. Clubs providing players receive $209m, triple $70m in 2014.

Fifa's 2015-18 budgeted revenue of $5.656 bn is $519m (10%) higher than 2011-14 $5.137 bn, mainly due to TV rights (up $516m), hospitality (up $390m) and licensing rights (up $248m). Almost 80% of FIFA’s 2015-18 $5.7 bn revenue budget comes from TV rights $3 bn (53%) and marketing rights $1.45 bn (26%). Remainder is licensing rights $363m (6%), hospitality and ticket sales $575m (10%) and other revenue $268m (5%).

Over 70% of FIFA’s $2.5 bn TV rights in 2011-14 came from deals in Europe $1.2 bn and Asia/North Africa $0.6 bn. Since then, major new deals have been signed for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups in North America (Telemundo $600m, Fox $400m) and China (CCTV $300-400m).

Fifa budgeted lower marketing rights for 2015-18, as many sponsors (Sony, Emirates, Castrol, Johnson & Johnson, Continental) did not renew, due to various corruption scandals, but latest estimates indicate this has been compensated by China (seven sponsors) and Russia (five sponsors).

What is striking is the increase in the 2019-22 development budget, up $671m (15%) from $1.65 bn to $2.3 bn. After many years when FIFA spent more on governance than football development, this is refreshing to see, but there is still a question over what member associations spend the money on.

There has been a steep reduction in President’s remuneration following the change from Blatter ($3.6m) to Infantino ($1.9m).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/