Skip to main content

Now that the World Cup is over, what about the stadiums?

The organisation of the World Cup in Russia has attracted widespread praise. In particular, the newly built and refurbished stadiums were hailed as high quality venues worthy of the tournament. But the 'legacy' issue is always a difficult one. Stadiums can easily become white elephants or even if uses are found they may provoke controversy because of sweetheart deals that have to be offered to secure occupancy as in the case of West Ham United and the London Stadium. Greece had one of the worst experiences with its Olympic venues: Abandoned stadiums.

The predicament is particularly acute in Russia, where vast distances between host cities, a lack of a strong football tradition outside Moscow and St. Petersburg, and tight regional finances mean that local governments are using creative ways to keep their stadiums in use. Only five top flight teams are privately owned, while the local governments and state-run companies that own the rest struggle to fund their teams. Four of the stadiums used for the World Cup do not have top flight teams and need outside sponsors to fund a push for promotion.

World Cup expenses accounted for significant increases in several host provinces' net debt after 2012, including nearly all of Samar's.

Sochi built its stadium for the Winter Olympics and then converted it into a football stadium. The Black Sea city has been unable to support a football team. Zhemchuzhina, a leading side in the 1990s, went bankrupt in 2003, while FK Sochi lasted two seasons in lower divisions a decade later.

The city enlisted Boris Rotenberg, a childhood friend of Mr Putin's, who bought Dinamo St. Petersburg, a second division side, and moved it to Sochi where it will play as FK Sochi. A bigger move than that of Wimbledon to Milton Keynes.

Mr Rotenberg's older brother Arkady is Mr Putin's judo partner and became a billionaire after his friend became president through winning pipeline contracts for state monopoly Gazprom.

The stadiums will cost a lot to maintain. The mayor of Volgograd expects to spend Rbs350m a year keeping the stadium running, but hopes that more tourists will be attracted to come to the site of the Battle of Stalingrad as a result of the publicity during the World Cup.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more