Skip to main content

How parachute payments work

Parachute payments were intended to cushion the blow of relegation from the Premier League and prevent clubs getting into financial difficulties. However, they have been criticised for distorting the competitive balance in the Championship. Clubs relegated from the Premier League now receive £91m over three years. The authoritative Swiss Ramble looks at how they work.

It is evident that parachutes have a major impact on the competitive balance in the Championship, as the six clubs with the highest revenue in 2016/17 all benefited from these payments, most notably the three relegated the previous season (Aston Villa, Norwich City and Newcastle United).

Eight Championship clubs received Premier League parachute payments in 2016/17 with Villa, Newcastle and Norwich getting £41m (up from £26m in 2015/16 thanks to the new TV deal), followed by QPR £31m, then Cardiff City, Fulham, Reading and Wigan all £16m.

If parachute payments were excluded, the same three clubs would still have the highest revenue, but different clubs would fill the next three places (Leeds, Birmigham City and Derby County – plus the gap would be much smaller.

Although the Premier League solidarity payment rose from £2.3m to £4.3m in 2016/17, most Championship clubs only receive £7-8m TV money (including £2.3m distribution from EFL). Clubs that receive parachute payments do not receive solidarity payments as well.

Parachute payments are calculated relative to Premier League equal share: year 1 – 55%, year 2 – 45%, year 3 – 20%. If a club is relegated after only one season in the top flight, it is only entitled to two years of payments, so £74m instead of £89m in 2016/17.

It is worth noting that the parachute payments for clubs relegated in earlier seasons can change in line with any updated TV deal. QPR actually got more in their second year after relegation (£31.2m) than their first year (£25.9m), while they get £16.6m in each of years 3 and 4, compared to the original £10.5m.

If a club is promoted to the Premier League, it will receive a minimum of £170m TV money, even if immediately relegated: £95m for last place in the Premiership plus £76m parachute payments. This helps explain why so many Championship clubs 'go for it', as the rewards are so lucrative.

The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'The argument in favour of parachute payments is that they encourage promoted clubs to invest to compete, safe in the knowledge that if they are relegated, then there is a safety net. However, they do undoubtedly create a huge revenue disadvantage for other Championship clubs.'

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more

Spurs CEO attacks luxury training base

The Tottenham Hotspur chief executive Vinai Venkatesham has issued a withering assessment of the way the club was run under Daniel Levy, likening the state-of-the-art training centre to a five-star hotel rather than a centre of high performance.  Venkatesham was appointed to his role in April 2025, having stepped down as chief executive at Arsenal the previous summer. However, he has said that some aspects of the club were “in a significantly worse state” than he expected.  “Our training centre is amazing, one of the best, if not the best in the world,” Venkatesham told BBC Sport. “But when you look around, it looks more like a five-star hotel than it does a performance environment. That will change over the summer. I think there are many areas where the club hasn’t got the right level of expertise.”  He explained that the football side of operations was the club’s main downfall when he arrived last year. [One Spurs fan wryly observed that it was like a water company sayi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more