Skip to main content

Abramovich turns down sale approach

A report that started with the Wall Street Journal but has been reproduced in the British press suggests that Roman Abramovich has rebuffed an inquiry from an American billionaire about buying Chelsea.

The approach was made by Ted Boehly who is the head of a Connecticut-based private investment firm. He is part owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team. The £3 billion asking price for Chelsea would make a big dent in his $5bn fortune.

Anyone who is going to buy Chelsea needs deep pockets as they would need to redevelop Stamford Bridge. Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Britain's richest man, had talks with Chelsea representatives, but considered the asking price to be poor value. He now owns Nice.

The Financial Times reported in August last year that Mr Abramovich had appointed Raine, a US merchant bank, to conduct a ‘strategic review’ of the club he bought in 2003, after receiving multiple offers from potential buyers. One of the offers came from Silver Lake who have now bought a stake in City Football Group.

Potential acquirers circled Chelsea last year amid an escalation in tensions between the UK and Russia following the poisoning of former Russian military intelligence officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury. Mr Abramovich later took Israeli citizenship after his application for a UK investor visa was delayed. Chelsea then shelved plans for a new £500m stadium in, citing an unfavourable investment climate.

Although he has not attended a Chelsea match since the visa delay, Mr Abramovich remains actively involved in club affairs and is happy to follow the team on television. The oligarch is prepared to consider offers that meet his £3bn valuation, the people said, but had yet to receive one.

'He’s not raring [to sell],' a person who helped Mr Abramovich buy the football club told the Pink 'Un. 'His asking price is prohibitive, but if he gets it, then maybe he will.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/