Skip to main content

Brighton heavily dependent on TV revenue

The authoritative Swiss Ramble examines the recently published accounts of Brighton and Hove Albion which showed a £22m loss in 2018/19. Only three clubs reported a larger loss than Brighton in 2017/18, namely Crystal Palace £36m, Watford £32m and Stoke City £30m.

The blogger notes, 'Brighton are no strangers to losses. In fact, they have only reported profits twice in the last 12 years (2008 and 2018). In that period, the club has accumulated £135m of losses, averaging £11m a year, mainly in the pursuit of promotion.'

The club have made very little from player sales [an increasingly important item for many clubs]. In fact, they have reported just £26m profit from this activity in the last 10 years. Their £17m profit from player sales over the last five years was the lowest of the clubs in the Premier League in the 2017/18 season. In stark contrast, Chelsea made £337m over this period, though Southampton’s £216m is perhaps more relevant.

A massive 79% of club revenue comes from TV, though in fairness this is not uncommon in the Premier League with no fewer than 12 clubs getting more than 75% of their money from broadcasting in 2017/18 with Bournemouth 'leading the way' with an astonishing 89%.

Since the move to the Amex, attendances have been steadily rising from the 7,352 in the last season at the Withdean to around 28,000 in the Championship and 30,000 in the Premier League, as the new stadium has finally met latent local demand for tickets.

Commercial income rose 7% (£0.7m) to £11.4m. This revenue stream has risen 70% since promotion, but is still one of the lowest in the top flight, only ahead of Huddersfield and Bournemouth (2017/18 figures). For context, Manchester United and Manchester City generate £275m and £227m respectively.

The American Express shirt (and stadium naming rights) sponsor is currently the lowest in the Premier League at £1.5m a year, though a new £100m 12-year deal (£8.3m a year) has been announced.

The wage bill increased by £24m (31%) from £78m to £102m, due to 'strengthening of playing squad and increased wages required to be competitive in the Premier League.' More than tripled since promotion – last season in Championship £31m. It is still firmly in the bottom half of the Premier League. The wages to turnover ratio increased (worsened) from 56% to 71%, which is just above the 70% upper limit recommended by UEFA. For some context, only seven clubs had a higher ratio in the Premier League in 2017/18.

The majority of Bloom’s funding (£176m) has gone on investment into the stadium and the training ground, though a hefty £137m was also spent (net) on new players for the club, while £47m was used to cover operating losses.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/