Skip to main content

China exercises soft power against Arsenal

Yesterday's game between Arsenal and Manchester City was pulled by Chinese state television after Mesut Ozil made remarks on social media about what he stated was the treatment of Uighur Muslims in China (claims denied by China). Ozil has German nationality, but is of Turkish heritage and his remarks were initially made in that language.

The game was replaced by a recording of the game between Wolves and another North London club. A Chinese state newspaper described Ozil's comments as 'false' and claimed he had 'disappointed' football authorities. In addition, the Chinese Football Association said Ozil's comments were 'unacceptable' and had 'hurt the feelings' of Chinese fans.

Arsenal were quick to distance themselves from his remarks on Chinese social media, saying that they were those of an individual and not the club and emphasising that the club was apolitical. Any exclusion from the lucrative Chinese market would be a commercial blow for Arsenal. In this case China has taken action against an individual club rather than the Premier League as a whole in contrast to the treatment of the National Basketball Association.

The BBC's Beijing correspondent Robin Brant commented: 'The NBA's crisis in China showed how serious and how immediate the impact on commercial interests could be. So important is football to the UK and its soft power that very senior British diplomats have pondered the impact on UK China relations of something like this.'

Speaking on Wake up to Money on Radio 5, Professor Simon Chadwick of the University of Salford made a good point when he said that there is often considerable ignorance in Premier League clubs about China. This was brought home to me when I was asked to brief a Premier League manager and it quickly became evident that he thought that China still had an Emperor which was not a good start.

The treatment of football I have seen on Chinese television is quite sophisticated. When Charlton were in the Premier League I was sitting in my room in Kunming and switched on the television to see an in depth explanation of the relationship between then manager Alan Curbishley and his assistant Keith Peacock.

Clearly there are contrasting views on this matter. One would be that clubs need to straighten out their thinking, to paraphrase Mao. The alternative view would be that the ability to speak out against claimed human rights abuses should not be curtailed. Whether footballers (like actors) should use their celebrity to intervene in politics is a matter for debate.

What is evident to me is that China is only just starting to realise the potential of soft power as distinct from hard (e.g., military) power and the extent to which sport offers an avenue for exerting influence elsewhere in the world. The Premier League television contract with China is worth half a billion pounds a year.

This is not a good time for Arsenal and Ozil is in trouble for his conduct at yesterday's match against Manchester City when he was substituted: Tantrum

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more