Skip to main content

China exercises soft power against Arsenal

Yesterday's game between Arsenal and Manchester City was pulled by Chinese state television after Mesut Ozil made remarks on social media about what he stated was the treatment of Uighur Muslims in China (claims denied by China). Ozil has German nationality, but is of Turkish heritage and his remarks were initially made in that language.

The game was replaced by a recording of the game between Wolves and another North London club. A Chinese state newspaper described Ozil's comments as 'false' and claimed he had 'disappointed' football authorities. In addition, the Chinese Football Association said Ozil's comments were 'unacceptable' and had 'hurt the feelings' of Chinese fans.

Arsenal were quick to distance themselves from his remarks on Chinese social media, saying that they were those of an individual and not the club and emphasising that the club was apolitical. Any exclusion from the lucrative Chinese market would be a commercial blow for Arsenal. In this case China has taken action against an individual club rather than the Premier League as a whole in contrast to the treatment of the National Basketball Association.

The BBC's Beijing correspondent Robin Brant commented: 'The NBA's crisis in China showed how serious and how immediate the impact on commercial interests could be. So important is football to the UK and its soft power that very senior British diplomats have pondered the impact on UK China relations of something like this.'

Speaking on Wake up to Money on Radio 5, Professor Simon Chadwick of the University of Salford made a good point when he said that there is often considerable ignorance in Premier League clubs about China. This was brought home to me when I was asked to brief a Premier League manager and it quickly became evident that he thought that China still had an Emperor which was not a good start.

The treatment of football I have seen on Chinese television is quite sophisticated. When Charlton were in the Premier League I was sitting in my room in Kunming and switched on the television to see an in depth explanation of the relationship between then manager Alan Curbishley and his assistant Keith Peacock.

Clearly there are contrasting views on this matter. One would be that clubs need to straighten out their thinking, to paraphrase Mao. The alternative view would be that the ability to speak out against claimed human rights abuses should not be curtailed. Whether footballers (like actors) should use their celebrity to intervene in politics is a matter for debate.

What is evident to me is that China is only just starting to realise the potential of soft power as distinct from hard (e.g., military) power and the extent to which sport offers an avenue for exerting influence elsewhere in the world. The Premier League television contract with China is worth half a billion pounds a year.

This is not a good time for Arsenal and Ozil is in trouble for his conduct at yesterday's match against Manchester City when he was substituted: Tantrum

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Millwall punch above their weight

Millwall’s season was overshadowed by the tragic death of owner John Berylson following a car accident. The American had been an exemplary owner, beloved by the fans for his leadership, passion and generosity. Millwall’s finances had been pretty good during his tenure, which we shall explore by looking at the most recent accounts from the 2022/23 season, when the club narrowly missed out on a place in the play-offs after finishing 8th. Millwall’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £12.6m to £12.2m, as revenue rose £0.8m (4%) from £18.6m to a club record £19.4m and player sales improved from a £0.1m loss to £2.5m profit. However, other operating income dropped from by £1.1m from £1.3m to £0.2m, while operating expenses increased £1.7m (5%) from £31.6m to £33.3m. The main driver of the revenue increase was broadcasting, which rose £1.1m (12%) from £9.1m to £10.2m, though match day was also up £0.4m (7%) from £5.8m to £6.2m. In contrast, commercial fell £0.7m (19%) from £3.7m to £3....
Post a Comment
Read more