Skip to main content

Interesting times at Aberdeen

The authoritative Swiss Ramble takes a look at Aberdeen's financial results for 2018/19. Aberdeen’s loss widened from £0.4m to £5.0m, almost entirely due to the £4.3m impairment of Pittodrie stadium. However, revenue rose £0.5m (3%) to another club record of £15.9m, though profit on player sales was unchanged at £0.3m. The only club in Scotland to generate sizeable profits from this activity was Celtic £17.7m, followed by Rangers £3.1m.

Aberdeen’s revenue growth was driven by gate receipts, which increased £0.6m (13%) to £5.4m, due to the cup runs, and commercial income, up £0.5m (7%) to £7.4m, despite a reduction in sponsorship. Broadcasting fell £0.6m (17%) to £3.1m.

The good news is that Aberdeen’s £16m revenue is the third highest in Scotland, but the bad news is that they are miles behind the big two Glasgow clubs. They are around a fifth of Celtic’s £83m and less than a third of Rangers’ £53m. The revenue gap between Aberdeen and Rangers has been increasing, as their rivals progressed up the Scottish leagues. Compared to Celtic, the difference is around the same as it was in 2013, but that is a hefty £67m.

Aberdeen have announced significant further investment of £5m from Dave Cormack, Tom Crotty, Roger Lee plus new investor, AMB Sports & Entertainment (who own MLS club Atlanta United).

Aberdeen’s reported loss of £5m is the second worst in the SPFL Premiership, though less than half of Rangers’ £11.4m. If the £4.3m stadium impairment were excluded, the loss would be cut to £0.7m. Highest profits reported by Celtic £11.3m and Hearts £2.9m.

Aberdeen have only managed to post an overall profit once in the last decade - £7.2m in 2015, which was largely due to a £6.6m debt write-off. In fairness, most of the losses in this period have been relatively small, so the total deficit over the decade is only £8.7m.

As noted by long-standing chairman, Stewart Milne, Aberdeen 'have more than doubled revenue from around £7.8m in 2013 to almost £16m today.' The £8.1m growth has been spread around the three revenue streams: gate receipts £3.2m, commercial £3.1m and broadcasting £1.7m.

SPFL chief executive Neil Doncaster described the latest domestic TV deal as “the highest prize fund in the history of the Scottish game”, but Aberdeen’s 4th place in the SFPL Premiership was only worth £1.8m. League winners Celtic received £3.4m. For some perspective, English Championship clubs receive more than twice as much (£7m), while those with parachute payments get £45m in the first year after relegation.

Aberdeen’s average attendance of 14,872 is around 43,000 lower than Celtic and 35,000 less than Rangers. Also below the Edinburgh clubs: Hearts 17,553 and Hibernian 17,474.

Aberdeen have been looking for a new stadium since 2009, but now have the site at Kingsford, where the training facility was opened last month. Milne admits that it will be a challenge to secure £45m funding required for the stadium, though some would come from sale of Pittodrie.

Aberdeen’s wage bill increased £0.7m (8%) to £9.2m, due to continued investment in the playing squad. Wages to turnover ratio worsened from 56% to 58%, though 'still within accepted industry norms and compares favourably to other clubs.' Milne has pointed out the difficulties of maintaining a competitive squad, particularly with rising wages in the English market, as evidenced by Adam Rooney’s move to 5th tier Salford City for a higher salary. Aberdeen’s £9m wage bill is lower than all English Championship clubs.

The Swiss Ramble concludes, 'These are interesting times at Aberdeen. As new chairman Dave Cormack said, “The new investment and this partnership with Atlanta will allow us to punch above our weight, trying to level the playing field against significantly higher income generated by Celtic and Rangers.”'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/