Billionaire grows a football network

Networks of football clubs in shared ownership are a growing phenomenon. The best known is City Football Group which controls Manchester City alongside a global network of clubs. Red Bull Salzburg in Austria has substantial influence over RB Leipzig in Germany. Controversial Charlton Athletic owner Roland Duchatelet tried to construct his own network which ran from Spain to Hungary via England and Belgium. It has now been largely dismantled.

The latest network is being constructed by Jim Ratcliffe, a reclusive 67-year old Briton who has made his money through his low profile petrochemicals company Ineos. He has an estimated fortune of £18bm.

He has invested in a wide array of sporting assets from sailing to cycling (he is a Manchester United fan). All football clubs in a network benefit from shared scouting networks, data analysis teams and coaches. But at Ineos, each club could get an edge from experts in different sporting disciplines, such as nutritionists and physiotherapists.

The first venture into football by Ineos went wrong when months after buying Lausanne-Sport in 2017, the club was relegated from the top tier of Swiss football a few months later. A search was then started for another team that could compete in the Champions League.

They toured Chelsea's training ground, but thought that the £2bn price demanded by Roman Abramovich was excessive. Bob Ratcliffe, the chief executive of Ineos Football and Jim Ratcliffe's brother, commented: 'How do you get a £2bn plus valuation for a club in a league with total revenue of £5bn and a total net operating profit of £500m?'

A bid was also considered for Newcastle United, but rejected as not offering sufficient value.

Moving beyond what was seen as the overpriced Premier League, Ineos settled on Nice in Ligue One. It is thought that relatively little spending, sixth in the league before its suspension, towards qualifying one of France's three Champions League places.

Environmental activists argue that Sir Jim is using sport to 'greenwash' his companies, although in fact few people have ever heard of them. People close to him say he is chasing financial returns rather than emotional ones.

Football economics guru Stefan Szymanski from the University of Michigan is sceptical. He told the Financial Times: 'Successful businessmen - always men - believe that they can manage a football club better than the managers who came before them. History shows that this belief is almost always false.'

He explained to the Pink 'Un: 'The problem is that the secret of a profitable business is typically the discovery of a mechanism to isolate it from the forces of competition - but this formula does not extend to football, where intense competition is inescapable.'

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog