Skip to main content

Forest 'moving in the right direction'

Locked down in his Zurich fastness, the Swiss Ramble analyses the recently published 2018/19 accounts of Nottingham Forest. He comments, 'There are some signs that Forest are moving in the right direction under Evangelos Marinakis, though the Championship is incredibly competitive, so there is no guarantee of success, especially as Forest are competing against many clubs fortified by parachute payments.'

The board has stated that remaining within the discipline of EFL’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules is a high priority. If required, this will be achieved by taking 'tough decisions' on player sales, 'notwithstanding substantial investment in the playing squad'.

The reality is that the club is still 'dependent on funding from its parent company'. In the last 10 years various owners have pumped £149m into the club. The vast majority of that has been used to simply cover operating losses with only £10m spent on improving infrastructure.

Forest broke-even from a cash flow perspective, but only thanks to £24m additional loans from the owners and £5m from player sales (net). Thus was needed to cover £27m losses from operational activities, plus £1m spent on infrastructure and £1m repayment of external loans.

The £39m gross debt is not that large for the Championship, far below the likes of Stoke City £141m, Boro £105m, Birmingham City £97m and Ipswich Town £96m.

Forest spent £23m on players, including Joao Carvalho, Lewis Grabban, Hillal Soudani and Tobias Figueiredo. Not only is this the third highest in the Championship to date in 2018/19, but is also more than Forest spent in the previous four years combined (partly due to the transfer embargo).

The wage bill rose 31% (£8.5m) from £27.7m to £36.3m, a club record, as the number of playing staff increased by nine to 74. This followed two successive years when wages had fallen. The wages to turnover ratio increased from 122% to 143%, which is the 7th highest (worst) in the Championship, though not as high as the 177% that Forest reported in 2014. However, it should be noted that more than half of the clubs in the Championship have ratios over 100%.

Commercial income rose 34% (£1.8m) from £5.2m to £7.0m, though this is still firmly in the lower half of the Championship, which is disappointing for a club with Forest's great tradition (two European cups).

Plans to redevelop the City Ground, increasing capacity by 8,000, have been put on hold due to 'delays in the planning process'. The club wants to increase revenue via improved hospitality and executive boxes. Had hoped to start rebuild of Peter Taylor stand at the end of this season.

Attendances had been declining, due to poor results on the pitch and unhappiness with the former owner, but they have bounced back strongly in the last two seasons. The 2018/19 average of 28,144 was around 40% (8,000) higher than the 19,676 low three years ago.

Revenue has grown by two-thirds (£10.0m) from £15.4m to £25.3m in the 5 years since 2014, though £3.9m of that is from bringing back in-house retail operations and catering. Another £4.1m is from broadcasting, mostly due to increase in Premier League solidarity payments.

If parachute payments were excluded, Forest's £25m would have been the 8th highest revenue in the Championship. They would still be a fair way below the leading clubs, e.g. Aston Villa £43m and Leeds United £41m, though the gap would be reduced to 'only' £16-18m. Despite the growth, the £25m revenue is mid-table in the Championship, significantly below clubs benefiting from parachute payments following relegation from the Premier League, such as Stoke City £71m, Swansea City £68m, Middlesbrough £56m, Aston Villa £54m and Hull City £48m.

Player sales have also become increasingly important for Forest [and indeed for many clubs], who have averaged £12m profit in the last three seasons, including £15m in 2016/17 (Burke & Lansbury) and £10m in 2017/18 (Assombalonga). Should also be decent this season (Appiah, Osborn and Chema).

Losses would have been much higher without owners writing-off £63m of loans: 2016 £18m, 2017 £40m and £2018 £5m. The largest write-off came in 2017 when Greek owner Evangelos Marinakis bought the club from Fawaz Al Hasawi.

The club have only reported a profit once since 2005 – and that was entirely due to a £40m loan write-off in 2017. Otherwise, the club has consistently lost money, amounting to just under £100m in the last decade.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl