Skip to main content

Boro balance the books by becoming a selling club

From his Zurich fastness the Swiss Ramble casts his analytical eye over the 2018/19 accounts of Middlesbrough. Boro improved from a £6m loss before tax to a £2m profit, even though revenue dropped £6m (10%) from £62m to £56m and expenses were £3m higher, because profit on player sales more than doubled from £15m to £33m.

They are actually one of just four Championship clubs to report a profit to date in 2018/19 with their £2m only behind Bristol City £11m, Hull City £3m and Rotherham £3m. This is a good performance, considering that almost all clubs lose money in this ultra-competitive division.

That said, Boro would have also posted a hefty loss without £33m profit from player sales, including Adama Traoré to Wolves, Ben Gibson to Burnley and Patrick Bamford to Leeds. This was the second highest in the Championship, only surpassed by Bristol City £38m.

Boro have made a profit twice in the last three years after accumulating £112m of losses in the previous six years, including a £32m record deficit in 2016. In part this has been achieved by becoming a selling club with an annual average profit of £20m on player sales over the last three years.

The £6m revenue decline was very largely driven by broadcasting’s £6m (12%) fall from £47m to £41m, due to a smaller parachute payment, though gate receipts also dropped £1m (15%) from £7m to £6m. Commercial rose slightly by £0.3m (4%) from £8.3m to £8.6m.

Boro's £56m is the fourth highest Championship revenue reported to date, only behind the three clubs relegated from the Premier League the previous season, namely WBA £71m, Stoke City £71m and Swansea City £68m, but just above Aston Villa £54m.

Revenue has fallen by £65m from £121m to £56m since relegation from the Premier League two years ago, and will further decrease in 2019/20 to around £24m after parachute payments stop (clubs only receive two years’ payments if relegated after one season). After this cushion is removed in 2019/20, they will only get the same £8-9m as most other Championship clubs (including £4.6m PL solidarity payment and £2.5m EFL distribution).

Unsurprisingly, Boro crowds are around 7,000 lower in the Championship compared to the 30,000 they attracted in the Premier League, though attendances are still much higher than most of the seasons when they were last in the second tier.

The wage bill was cut by 18% (£9m) from £49m to £40m, so has now fallen by 38% (£25m) from £65m two years ago in the Premier League. Wages to turnover ratio improved from 79% to 72%. Wages will further decrease in 2019/20 to offset the lack of parachute payment revenue. The 72% wages to turnover ratio was actually one of the lowest (best) in the Championship, where more than half of the clubs have ratios over 100%.

The club made £11m player purchases, including Aden Flint and George Saville. Significantly less than prior season’s massive £66m, which Pulis described as 'the most disastrous transfer window in the club’s history'. Still quite high for the Championship, but miles below Stoke’s £67m.

Gross debt rose £4m to £105m, all of which is owed to the owner. In fact, Gibson’s debt increased £11m, while a £7m bank loan was repaid. Debt would have been even higher had £63m not been converted into share capital, highlighting Gibson’s financial support. The £105m gross debt is the third highest in the Championship, only below Blackburn Rovers £142m and Stoke City £141m. However, like almost all debt in this division, it is provided interest-free by the owner, so is of the 'soft' variety.

A fan commented: 'Thank god for Steve Gibson and upon further reflection what a great job Tony Pulis did by keeping the team competitive whilst selling prized assets and significantly reducing the wage bill.' That support is even more valuable in current circumstances.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/