Skip to main content

Covid hits revenue at leading clubs

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has been looking at the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on European clubs.  He comments: 'Although it’s early days in the reporting period for football club accounts from the extended 2019/20 season, we can already see the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in a few selected announcements from some European clubs.'

'Clearly, football clubs are suffering from the impact of the pandemic. This is only a small sample, but it is a sign of things to come at every club, namely large revenue reductions, partly mitigated by cost savings, covered by taking on more debt or capital put in by owners.'

Barcelona have estimated a further €65m reduction in revenue in 2020/21 from €856m to €791m, partly mitigated by including TV money for 2019/20 competitions completed in July and August. That would mean a total revenue loss of nearly half a billion (€471m) over two years.

Barcelona were keen to emphasise that without COVID they would have achieved their objective of reaching €1 bln revenue (including player sales) in 2019/20, i.e. growing €69m from €990m to €1,059m. However, the pandemic caused a €203m loss, reducing revenue to €856m.

It’s obvious that clubs lose match day income when playing games behind closed doors, but what is perhaps more revealing is the substantial reduction in commercial revenue via reduced sponsorship and lower retail sales. If that’s the case at Barcelona, what about others?

Some clubs have partially compensated for their revenue losses by reducing their wage bills, e.g. Juventus €43m (four months salary not paid from May to June), Barcelona€36m (70% cut during lockdown) and Lazio €18m (two months salary given up).

The Swiss Ramble states, 'By my calculations, the AS Roma €204m and Milan €195m losses are the second and third highest losses ever in Italy, only surpassed by Inter€207m in 2006/07. Not far behind largest ever loss of €219m by Manchester City in 2010/11. It is also worth noting that these terrible figures would have been even worse without some hefty profits on player sales.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/