Skip to main content

Radical plan to shake up Premier League

Liverpool and Manchester United have come up with a radical plan to shake up the Premier League which would see it reduced to 18 clubs: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54499998

The plan is being opposed by the league itself, but is expected to attract the backing of the other top six clubs who have been involved in talks.  They would have special voting status, alongside three other clubs with a long-term Premier League record (Everton, Southampton and West Ham United).   Changes could be made with the support of just six of these nine long-term 'shareholders'.

The EFL would get its £250m bailout package and 25 per cent of all future revenue, but the highly distorting parachute payments would be scrapped.   Another sweetener is fan away tickets to be capped at £20.

Football finance guru Kieran Maguire is concerned that every time Championship clubs get more money they spend it on wages.  He also thinks a big issue is that the top six would get a bigger share of Champions League money, but others have argued they get most of it anyway.

He also notes, 'Another interesting snippet from Project Big Picture is that PL clubs will be able to sell their own TV rights for 8 games a season internationally. This will reduce the value of the centrally negotiated overseas TV deals and concentrate more money in the hands of the big clubs.'

Maguire has suggested a levy on betting and another one on transfers.

Football journalist David Conn sees some merit in the proposal: https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2020/oct/11/plan-to-mend-the-great-crack-in-football-pyramid-should-not-be-swept-off-the-table

Seven of these nine clubs are foreign owned, while Tottenham Hotspur's owner is resident in the Bahamas.

At the moment the top club owns 1.8 times as much as the bottom club from Premier League deals.  This could become four times as much, enriching the top six.   It has been argued that one of the attractions of the Premier League as it is now organised is that it is very competitive and that would be undermined by the 'Project Big Picture'  plan.   Some see it as a trojan horse for a European Super League.

However, EFL chairman Rick Parry sees it as a means of closing the gap between the top of the Championship and the bottom of the Premier League.   The plan would see two up, two down but a play off between the 16th placed Premier League club and those placed third, fourth and fifth in the Championship.

The plan got short shrift from the Department of Culture, Media and Sport, a spokesman denouncing 'backroom deals cooked up that would create a closed shop at the very top of the game.'

Such has been the strength of opposition that the plan may never get off the ground.   However, football expert Chris Anderson reckons it merits serious discussion - unacceptable in its present form, but what would a compromise look like?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl