Skip to main content

Sponsorship challenge for United

One thing that has always given Manchester United an edge over their rivals is the sophistication of their commercial operation which has managed to sell obscure sponsorships to remote parts of the globe.

Despite an 11 per cent drop in revenues, compared with the same period a year ago, to £59.4m, the income from sponsorship was more resilient than broadcasting and match day income. They fell almost 60 per cent and 77 per cent respectively.

However, sponsors deferred over £80m of payments to United. The club has gone to great lengths to ensure that cash from commercial partners continues to flow, for example allowing General Motors’ Chevrolet flexibility in its remaining payments as the team’s main shirt sponsor.

But as well as protecting the value of its current contracts, the club is looking for a new shirt sponsor ahead of the expiry of the $559m seven-year deal with Chevrolet at the end of the current Premier League campaign in summer 2021.

It’s not the first time Richard Arnold, group managing director, has dealt with sponsorship worries. AIG’s logo was emblazoned on the Red Devils’ shirts when the insurer had to be bailed out during the financial crisis.

We’re none the wiser as to whose logo will adorn the famous red shirts once the Chevy deal ends. And United’s results showed that the partners have agreed to extend the deal to the end of 2021 because of the “disruption caused by the pandemic” at no extra cost to Chevrolet.

So is United undermining the value of its own shirt by giving Chevrolet an additional six months ostensibly free of charge? Not exactly. Just think of the cancelled fixtures and the diminished spectacle of games without fans. Plus, GM has its own problems.

Trickier still is that the extended deal ends in the middle of 2021/22 season, potentially creating an issue for Adidas, the club’s kit supplier, given that new shirts traditionally go on sale in the summer.

Striking a timely deal could allow United to resolve its predicament. There’s precedent for compensating partners to end a deal early, and doing so would allow the next sponsor to paste its logo onto United’s shirts ahead of the season start.

The search will test United’s ability to sign a new shirt sponsor on attractive terms at a time when many companies are cutting their sponsorship budgets.  If United find it difficult, that doesn't bode well for other clubs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/