Napoli needs to sell players to balance the books

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the 2019/20 accounts of Napoli.

The club swung from €48m pre-tax profit to €20m loss, a €68m deterioration, as revenue fell €38m (17%) from €217m to €179m and expenses rose €43m (17%) to €295m, partly offset by €13m increase in profit on player sales to €96m. After tax, €29m profit to €19m loss.

All revenue streams were lower with broadcasting being the largest reduction, down €22m (15%) to €121m, though there were also falls in commercial, down €5m (11%) to €42m, and match day, down €3m (17%) to €13m.

The post-tax €19m loss is not great, but it is much lower than huge 2019/20 losses at other Italian clubs, impacted by COVID, e.g. Roma €204m, Milan €195m, Inter €102m and Juventus €90m. The pandemic has reduced Napoli revenue by an estimated €32m.

Napoli have posted four losses in the last six years, though have accumulated an impressive €196m profits over the last decade, including two hefty profits in 2017 (€101m) and 2019 (€48m). Unless the COVID situation improves, club is likely to report a substantial loss in 2021.

Player sales are very important for Napoli, increasingly so, as they have averaged €65m a season in the last five years compared to only €24m in previous five. The club needs to periodically sell stars to balance the books. The €325m profit from player sales in last five years is only beaten by Juventus €563m and Roma €372m, but is €100m more than the next highest, Inter €226m.

Revenue growth highlights the importance of the Champions League, as 2020 revenue of €179m was greatly boosted by €67m from this tournament. It is imperative that they do well in Europe as Serie A television rights are relatively low. They have earned an impressive €246m from Europe in the last five seasons, only surpassed in Italy by Juventus €449m and Roma €255m, but ahead of Inter €117m, Lazio €76m, Atalanta €71m and Milan €29m.

Revenue is now third highest in Italy, though less than half of Juventus €407m and €132m below Inter. That said, they have overtaken both Milan €172m and Roma €149m.

Commercial income has hardly grown in the last decade, leading to a massive disparity with other leading European clubs. Even before last season’s decrease, their €46m in 2018/19 was miles below the likes of Barcelona €384m, PSG €363m, Bayern €357m.

Wages up €56m in the last 4 years, while revenue only rose €35m, increasing wages to turnover from 59% to 79%. In fact, since 2016 wages growth of €56m has only been outpaced by Inter €74m and Juventus €63m.

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog