Skip to main content

Losses in seven seasons out of nine for Bournemouth

From his Zurich fastness the Swiss Ramble reviews the 2019/20 accounts of AFC Bournemouth.

The club’s loss almost doubled from £32m to a club record £60m, largely due to revenue dropping £36m (27%) from £131m to £95m, partly offset by profit on player sales rising £20m to £23m.

The revenue decrease was mainly attributable to COVID, which contributed to broadcasting falling £35m (30%) from £116m to £81m, though match day was also down £1.5m (29%) from £5.0m to £3.5m. These reductions were partly compensated by commercial rising £1m (9%) to £11m.

The Cherries have now reported losses three years in a row, amounting to £103m, having made money in their first two seasons in the Premier League. Before that they posted four consecutive years of losses, including a hefty £39m deficit in the 2014/15 promotion season.

Without COVID, revenue can be estimated as £25m higher at £121m (8% less than 2019), as £18m broadcasting deferred to 2020/21 and £7m foregone (TV rebate £6m, match day £1m), meaning the club would have posted a £35m loss, around the same as prior year.

Following relegation from the Premier League,  TV income will fall significantly in 2020/21, albeit cushioned by £42m parachute payment, giving them much higher revenue than most other Championship clubs. Parachutes then fall to £35m (year 2) and £16m (year 3).

The wage bill fell £3m (3%) from £111m to £108m, as some senior members of non-playing staff took voluntary pay reductions. Nevertheless wages have risen £36m (51%) in the last three years, even though revenue has fallen £41m (30%) in the same period.

Due to the revenue fall, the wages to turnover ratio increased (worsened) from 85% to 113%, the highest in Premier League to date in 2019/20 and the worst in the top flight since QPR’s 129% in 2013.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/