Skip to main content

Cardiff would have broken even without pandemic

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has reviewed the 2019/20 accounts of Cardiff City.

The club swung from £3m profit to £12m loss, as revenue fell £79m (63%) from £125m to £46m due to relegation and COVID, partly offset by profit on player sales rising £12m to £14m, while expenses were down £33m and no repeat of prior year £20m provision for the Sala transfer.

Although the £12m loss is clearly not great, it was around mid-table in the Championship with many clubs reporting much larger losses in 2019/20, including Stoke City £88m.

In the decade since Vincent Tan bought the club in May 2010, they have accumulated £142m of losses, half in last 4 years. In that period the club has only had two (small) profits, £4m in 2015 and £3m in 2019. They even contrived to lose £12m in the Premier League in 2014.

The £79m revenue fall was largely driven by broadcasting’s £70m (66%) decrease from £107m to £37m, due to lower TV money in Championship, though commercial also dropped £5m (48%) from £10m to £5m and match day fell £4m (53%) from £8m to £4m.   Even after the fall, revenue was still the 6th highest in the Championship.

If parachute payments were excluded, revenue would fall to £18m (£42m parachute less £2.1m rebate and £7.8m revenue deferral, replaced by £4.5m solidarity payment). This would have placed them mid-table in the Championship, around a third of Leeds £54m.

The Bluebirds will receive around £76m in parachute payments: £42m in 2019/20 and £34m in 2020/21 (before any COVID rebates). They only get two years of payments instead of the usual three years, as they were relegated after just one season in the Premier League.

To compensate for the steep revenue decline, the club cut the wage bill by £18m (34%) from £54m to £36m and other expenses by £6m (31%) to £14m.

Commercial income halved from £10.4m to £5.5m, partly due to the pandemic causing loss of revenue and sponsorship opportunities.  They are now in the bottom half of the Championship, far below the likes of Leeds £34m, Bristol City £14m and Stoke City £14m.

COVID resulted in £12.3m reduction to revenue, split between £3.5m lost (match day £1.1m, TV rebates £2.4m) and £8.8m broadcasting deferred to 2020/21. Without this, revenue would have been £58m and they would have broken-even.

Profit on player sales rose £12m from £2m to £14m, mainly Bobby Reid to Fulham, Kenneth Zohore to WBA and Bruno Manga to Dijon. That’s pretty good, but still a fair bit lower than WBA £29m, Bristol City £26m, Brentford £25m and Hull City £23m.  The club have made very little money from player sales, only £31m in total in the last decade, most of which came in just two years (£10m in 2015 and £14m in 2020).

Following relegation, the wages to turnover ratio increased from an incredibly low 43% in the Premier League to 77%, which is the third lowest (best) in the Championship. The vast majority of clubs in this division have unsustainable ratios well over 100%


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do