Cardiff would have broken even without pandemic

The authoritative Swiss Ramble has reviewed the 2019/20 accounts of Cardiff City.

The club swung from £3m profit to £12m loss, as revenue fell £79m (63%) from £125m to £46m due to relegation and COVID, partly offset by profit on player sales rising £12m to £14m, while expenses were down £33m and no repeat of prior year £20m provision for the Sala transfer.

Although the £12m loss is clearly not great, it was around mid-table in the Championship with many clubs reporting much larger losses in 2019/20, including Stoke City £88m.

In the decade since Vincent Tan bought the club in May 2010, they have accumulated £142m of losses, half in last 4 years. In that period the club has only had two (small) profits, £4m in 2015 and £3m in 2019. They even contrived to lose £12m in the Premier League in 2014.

The £79m revenue fall was largely driven by broadcasting’s £70m (66%) decrease from £107m to £37m, due to lower TV money in Championship, though commercial also dropped £5m (48%) from £10m to £5m and match day fell £4m (53%) from £8m to £4m. Even after the fall, revenue was still the 6^th highest in the Championship.

If parachute payments were excluded, revenue would fall to £18m (£42m parachute less £2.1m rebate and £7.8m revenue deferral, replaced by £4.5m solidarity payment). This would have placed them mid-table in the Championship, around a third of Leeds £54m.

The Bluebirds will receive around £76m in parachute payments: £42m in 2019/20 and £34m in 2020/21 (before any COVID rebates). They only get two years of payments instead of the usual three years, as they were relegated after just one season in the Premier League.

To compensate for the steep revenue decline, the club cut the wage bill by £18m (34%) from £54m to £36m and other expenses by £6m (31%) to £14m.

Commercial income halved from £10.4m to £5.5m, partly due to the pandemic causing loss of revenue and sponsorship opportunities. They are now in the bottom half of the Championship, far below the likes of Leeds £34m, Bristol City £14m and Stoke City £14m.

COVID resulted in £12.3m reduction to revenue, split between £3.5m lost (match day £1.1m, TV rebates £2.4m) and £8.8m broadcasting deferred to 2020/21. Without this, revenue would have been £58m and they would have broken-even.

Profit on player sales rose £12m from £2m to £14m, mainly Bobby Reid to Fulham, Kenneth Zohore to WBA and Bruno Manga to Dijon. That’s pretty good, but still a fair bit lower than WBA £29m, Bristol City £26m, Brentford £25m and Hull City £23m. The club have made very little money from player sales, only £31m in total in the last decade, most of which came in just two years (£10m in 2015 and £14m in 2020).

Following relegation, the wages to turnover ratio increased from an incredibly low 43% in the Premier League to 77%, which is the third lowest (best) in the Championship. The vast majority of clubs in this division have unsustainable ratios well over 100%

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog