Skip to main content

What cost control measures would work?

Writing for The Athletic, football finance guru looks at possible ways of restraining spending by top clubs.

At present clubs are allowed to lose £15 million pre-tax over a rolling three-year period. However, certain costs (academy, community, women’s team, infrastructure) are excluded, and owners are allowed to contribute via share issues a further £90 million over the three-year period.

Maguire tries to work out the effect of a crude version of the La Liga model that focuses on future expenditure

Those clubs that have had historic good control over costs would be rewarded, and the Big Six would still enjoy a substantial financial advantage over the other clubs. At the bottom end of the table, the sight of Everton might initially surprise but the club has spent a lot in recent seasons and this has resulted in high wages and amortisation fees, which would be clawed back by a tighter budget for 2021-22.

If such rules were to be introduced there would have to be a transition period in which clubs would adjust their spending behaviour to avoid having to face a “cliff face” fall in spending. 

The introduction of such a scheme might be seen as a disincentive for ambitious owners such as Farhad Moshiri at Everton and Wes Edens and Nassef Sawiris at Villa. Unless initial spending was turned into instant success, and thus revenue, they would be likely to be faced with much reduced budgets earlier than at present.

The fear among critics is that introducing such rules into the Premier League will “bake in” the existing financial advantage that the Big Six/Five/Four (delete as necessary based on whether you consider Arsenal and Spurs to be legitimate challengers to the other large clubs) possess. This will result in a disincentive for new owners to invest in Premier League clubs and could in the longer term make the product less unpredictable, and potentially less interesting to viewers.

Regardless of the rules, there are likely to be winners and losers. As soon as any changes to cost control are introduced expect to see accountants and lawyers at some clubs beavering away to find weaknesses and loopholes that can be exploited. Any independent regulator is going to need to be adept at Whack-A-Mole as a series of challenges arise to new measures.

 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Millwall punch above their weight

Millwall’s season was overshadowed by the tragic death of owner John Berylson following a car accident. The American had been an exemplary owner, beloved by the fans for his leadership, passion and generosity. Millwall’s finances had been pretty good during his tenure, which we shall explore by looking at the most recent accounts from the 2022/23 season, when the club narrowly missed out on a place in the play-offs after finishing 8th. Millwall’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £12.6m to £12.2m, as revenue rose £0.8m (4%) from £18.6m to a club record £19.4m and player sales improved from a £0.1m loss to £2.5m profit. However, other operating income dropped from by £1.1m from £1.3m to £0.2m, while operating expenses increased £1.7m (5%) from £31.6m to £33.3m. The main driver of the revenue increase was broadcasting, which rose £1.1m (12%) from £9.1m to £10.2m, though match day was also up £0.4m (7%) from £5.8m to £6.2m. In contrast, commercial fell £0.7m (19%) from £3.7m to £3....
Post a Comment
Read more