Skip to main content

What cost control measures would work?

Writing for The Athletic, football finance guru looks at possible ways of restraining spending by top clubs.

At present clubs are allowed to lose £15 million pre-tax over a rolling three-year period. However, certain costs (academy, community, women’s team, infrastructure) are excluded, and owners are allowed to contribute via share issues a further £90 million over the three-year period.

Maguire tries to work out the effect of a crude version of the La Liga model that focuses on future expenditure

Those clubs that have had historic good control over costs would be rewarded, and the Big Six would still enjoy a substantial financial advantage over the other clubs. At the bottom end of the table, the sight of Everton might initially surprise but the club has spent a lot in recent seasons and this has resulted in high wages and amortisation fees, which would be clawed back by a tighter budget for 2021-22.

If such rules were to be introduced there would have to be a transition period in which clubs would adjust their spending behaviour to avoid having to face a “cliff face” fall in spending. 

The introduction of such a scheme might be seen as a disincentive for ambitious owners such as Farhad Moshiri at Everton and Wes Edens and Nassef Sawiris at Villa. Unless initial spending was turned into instant success, and thus revenue, they would be likely to be faced with much reduced budgets earlier than at present.

The fear among critics is that introducing such rules into the Premier League will “bake in” the existing financial advantage that the Big Six/Five/Four (delete as necessary based on whether you consider Arsenal and Spurs to be legitimate challengers to the other large clubs) possess. This will result in a disincentive for new owners to invest in Premier League clubs and could in the longer term make the product less unpredictable, and potentially less interesting to viewers.

Regardless of the rules, there are likely to be winners and losers. As soon as any changes to cost control are introduced expect to see accountants and lawyers at some clubs beavering away to find weaknesses and loopholes that can be exploited. Any independent regulator is going to need to be adept at Whack-A-Mole as a series of challenges arise to new measures.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/