Skip to main content

Can Ronaldo pay for himself?

Ronaldo certainly showed he can deliver on the pitch on Saturday, but what about the revenue side of the equation?  He will cost at least £50m or five per cent of United's projected revenues over the next two years.  The money could not be recouped through shirt sales or sponsorship deals.

The club is hoping for more intangible returns.   These include a belief that Ronaldo will raise standards in the team, excite fans who protested against the club's involvement in the European Super League, and draw in a new generation of supporters.  With 340 million Instagram followers, it is believed he will attract younger and international audiences.

At Juventus commercial income rose from €143m to €175m during his three years at the club, but the Serie A side were starting from a lower base.  The marginal benefit for United is not so high.  United's commercial revenue was £279m in 2020.  It has already secured its biggest endorsement deals, such as a five year shirt sponsorship worth €275m with German tech group TeamViewer.   The vast majority of revenues from replica shirt sales is taken by Adidas.

Ronaldo's contract, like those of other United players, includes 'downside protections' such as wage cuts if the team fails to qualify for the Champions League.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow
Post a Comment
Read more

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is
Post a Comment
Read more

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/
Post a Comment
Read more