When Glazer bought his first wedge of United shares in March 2003, spending about £9 million on a 2.9 per cent stake, the club was on its way to an eighth Premier League title in 11 seasons and had cash in the bank without debt.
By the time he completed his hostile takeover, just over two
years later, the club was £660 million in debt, with half of that borrowing
placed on the club itself and the other half on his takeover vehicle, Red
Football. The split was pretty academic, though, as Manchester United were
paying the interest and that bill was enormous.
In 2006, the club’s interest payments totalled £113 million,
against annual revenue of £168 million. Over the next four years, United paid
an average of £95 million a year in interest, which meant more than a third of
the club’s total earnings were being taken to service
Malcolm Glazer had needed some eye-wateringly expensive
loans to get over the hump in 2005, and these payment-in-kind (PIK) loans ended
up in the hands of three hedge funds: Citadel, Och-Ziff Capital Management and
Perry Capital. The interest on these loans ramped up from 14.25 per cent to
16.25 per cent, and United’s total debts were now over £700 million.
But five years after the takeover, the Glazers were able to
refinance via a £500 million issue of bonds — debt securities that banks,
individual investors or pension funds buy at an agreed interest rate and an
agreed term. In United’s case, this interest was about 8.5 per cent, cutting
the bill in half, and the term was seven years.
In 2005, United’s annual turnover was just under £159
million, with the largest slice (£66 million) coming on match days. Commercial
revenue was £45 million.
In 2019, the year the club earned a record £627 million,
match-day receipts had nearly doubled to £111 million, but commercial revenue
had grown by 600 per cent to £275 million. That figure alone is over £100
million more than any club outside the Premier League’s “big six” earns in
total.
Kieran Maguire of the PriceofFootball commented, ‘United had
£6 million in the bank and no debt when the original deal took place. The
lenders provided about £600 million of the cost of the acquisition. The club is
now worth, in my opinion, at least £2.6 billion and the debt is still £500
million, which leaves more than £2 billion for the shareholders and a 2,000 per
cent return on investment.’
‘Initially, the interest rates were high, peaking at 16.25
per cent, which reflected the risk in the eyes of the bank. But as the revenues
have increased, so the risk level has fallen and the debt now is a non-issue.
The banks get a guaranteed £20 million in interest every year and the Glazers
can kick the can down the road in terms of the capital payments.’
They have taken out more than £120 million in dividends over
the last five years, on top of consultancy fees and soft loans in the early
years, and now the siblings are starting to sell significant chunks of their
shares.
In March, Avram Glazer sold £70 million of shares, and last
month his brothers Kevin and Edward sold similar stakes, bringing in almost
£140 million… for them, not United. And the family still owns nearly 70 per
cent of the total shares and all of the all-important class B shares, which are
worth 10 votes for every class A share. The club is a private cashpoint for the
Glazers at this point.
An absolute failure of football regulation and governance in permitting the Glazers's leveraged buy out of the club I have supported for 30 years.I sincerely hope the inquiry into football post the European Super League debacle will recommend a move to the German model of club ownership-I'm not holding my breath.
ReplyDelete