Skip to main content

The Glazers and United's debt

When Glazer bought his first wedge of United shares in March 2003, spending about £9 million on a 2.9 per cent stake, the club was on its way to an eighth Premier League title in 11 seasons and had cash in the bank without debt.

By the time he completed his hostile takeover, just over two years later, the club was £660 million in debt, with half of that borrowing placed on the club itself and the other half on his takeover vehicle, Red Football. The split was pretty academic, though, as Manchester United were paying the interest and that bill was enormous.

In 2006, the club’s interest payments totalled £113 million, against annual revenue of £168 million. Over the next four years, United paid an average of £95 million a year in interest, which meant more than a third of the club’s total earnings were being taken to service

Malcolm Glazer had needed some eye-wateringly expensive loans to get over the hump in 2005, and these payment-in-kind (PIK) loans ended up in the hands of three hedge funds: Citadel, Och-Ziff Capital Management and Perry Capital. The interest on these loans ramped up from 14.25 per cent to 16.25 per cent, and United’s total debts were now over £700 million.

But five years after the takeover, the Glazers were able to refinance via a £500 million issue of bonds — debt securities that banks, individual investors or pension funds buy at an agreed interest rate and an agreed term. In United’s case, this interest was about 8.5 per cent, cutting the bill in half, and the term was seven years.

In 2005, United’s annual turnover was just under £159 million, with the largest slice (£66 million) coming on match days. Commercial revenue was £45 million.

In 2019, the year the club earned a record £627 million, match-day receipts had nearly doubled to £111 million, but commercial revenue had grown by 600 per cent to £275 million. That figure alone is over £100 million more than any club outside the Premier League’s “big six” earns in total.

Kieran Maguire of the PriceofFootball commented, ‘United had £6 million in the bank and no debt when the original deal took place. The lenders provided about £600 million of the cost of the acquisition. The club is now worth, in my opinion, at least £2.6 billion and the debt is still £500 million, which leaves more than £2 billion for the shareholders and a 2,000 per cent return on investment.’

‘Initially, the interest rates were high, peaking at 16.25 per cent, which reflected the risk in the eyes of the bank. But as the revenues have increased, so the risk level has fallen and the debt now is a non-issue. The banks get a guaranteed £20 million in interest every year and the Glazers can kick the can down the road in terms of the capital payments.’

They have taken out more than £120 million in dividends over the last five years, on top of consultancy fees and soft loans in the early years, and now the siblings are starting to sell significant chunks of their shares.

In March, Avram Glazer sold £70 million of shares, and last month his brothers Kevin and Edward sold similar stakes, bringing in almost £140 million… for them, not United. And the family still owns nearly 70 per cent of the total shares and all of the all-important class B shares, which are worth 10 votes for every class A share. The club is a private cashpoint for the Glazers at this point.

Comments

  1. An absolute failure of football regulation and governance in permitting the Glazers's leveraged buy out of the club I have supported for 30 years.I sincerely hope the inquiry into football post the European Super League debacle will recommend a move to the German model of club ownership-I'm not holding my breath.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to depl