Skip to main content

United will have biggest English wage bill ever

The authoritative Swiss Ramble reviews the Q1 results of Manchester United from his Zurich lair.

The pre-tax loss improved from £27m to £20m (£16m after tax), as revenue increased £17m (16%) from £109m to £126m and player sales swung from £13m loss to £17m profit, though expenses up £31m (25%). Operational improvement offset by interest payable rising £10m (forex losses).

The main driver of the £17m revenue increase was match day, which rose £17m from £2m to £19m, though commercial was also up £4m (8%) from £60m to £64m. In contrast, broadcasting fell £5m (9%) from £48m to £43m.

Interest went from zero in Q1 2021 to £10m net payable in Q1 2022, largely due to an unfavourable swing in unrealised foreign exchange movements on the club’s debt, which is denominated in USD, compared to a favourable swing prior year.

This is the second year in a row that United have reported a pre-tax loss in Q1, even though it was lower in 2021/22. It is worth noting that last season’s £27m loss in Q1 ultimately became a £24m loss for the full year.

The club have reported operating losses for the past two seasons, so it is no surprise to see another deficit in Q1, especially as the club tends to lose money in the first quarter. However, the £28m operating loss in Q1 2021/22 is the highest made for this period.

Although it is clearly good news that  revenue increased from £109m to £126m in Q1, it has still not returned to the £135m level pre-pandemic. This suggests that United are unlikely to reach the 2019 peak of £627m (though much will depend on Champions League progress).

Commercial income was up £4m (8%) to £64m, due to retail and merchandising rising by £5m (9%) to £28m, thanks to “increased Megastore footfall” (aided by the Ronaldo factor), though sponsorship dipped slightly to £36m. No pre-season tour possible.  This is still below 2020 Q1 £80m peak.

Q1 figures still include revenue from the highly lucrative £64m Chevrolet shirt sponsorship, as the contract was extended by 6 months to December 2021. However, this will be replaced in January by TeamViewer £47m, which is much lower than the current deal.

United estimate that their wage bill will rise by “around 20%” this season, as a result of signing Ronaldo, Varane and Sancho. That would imply a £65m increase to £387m in 2022, which would be the highest ever in England, around the same level as Barcelona in 2020.

£141m gross transfer spend in Q1 2021/22 was more than the £116m outlay in the whole of 2020/21, though not as high as some other years, e.g. £243m in 2017/18. Net spend in Q1 was £112m. United’s gross spend since 2014 is just under £1.5 ln.

Although it has fallen from its peak, the annual interest payment of about £20m is a lot higher than every other Premier League club. In Q1 2021/22 United paid £8m, around the same as previous years.   have found enough cash to pay shareholders (mainly the Glazers) an £11m dividend in Q1, delayed from 2020/21. Another semi-annual dividend will be paid on 7 January 2022. United are the only Premier League club to pay meaningful dividends (£133m since 2016).




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/