Skip to main content

Why United is like a rare painting

Orthodox ways of valuing Manchester United (or any other leading football club) fail to come up with figures that reflect the distorted realities of the bidding process.  It's like looking in a hall of distorted mirrors which puff up your size.

The Financial Times admits as much in a 'Lex in Depth' look at the club's valuation.   Out come discounted cash flow and other tried and tested techniques to arrive at a figure of $1.6bn which the Pink 'Un admits is 'very low'.  What works in other economic sectors does not fit football.

The share price implies a valuation of $4.5bn, although that is hard to justify in terms of the underlying financials.     However, that does not account of the potential for growth through non fungible tokens and sports betting.   Even so, people may start to see through NFTs as a gimmick and sports betting faces some challenges.  

Chelsea's sale went through at five times its revenue, although in United's case that would produce a figure of just $4.3bn.

Whoever buys United will have to refurbish Old Trafford and the training ground, although Chelsea's owners face a bigger challenge at their more constrained site.  United does at least own a substantial amount of land around its stadium which could offer future development potential.

United's revenue streams from broadcast income - its biggest source of revenue - and commercial income from sponsorship deals have both plateaued.   Operating costs, primarily player wages, keep going up.

So are we at the top of the market for trophy assets?   I think the best analogy is a painting by a leading artist, still fashionable, whose work rarely comes on to the market.  The price obtained generally exceeds estimates by the auctioneer.   Opportunities to own truly global sporting franchises like United are rare.

So I think United is worth at least $5bn and perhaps $6bn.   The Glazers won't accept less and may end up with a minority investment deal with an activist hedge fund or specialist financier.

Kieran Maguire reports on Monday afternoon: 'Manchester United share price has fallen another 12.9% today as market gets jitters that Glazers will not sell. Market value of club has fallen by $1.2 billion in just over a week .'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/