Skip to main content

Chelsea's business model relies on player sales

Chelsea’s pre-tax loss reduced from £156m to £122m, as revenue increased by £46m (11%) from £436m to a club record £481m. The loss would have been even higher without the benefit of £123m profit from player sales, up £95m from the previous season’s £28m.

Chelsea’s £121m pre-tax loss is the second highest in the Premier League, only surpassed by Manchester United’s £150m, though plenty of big losses were reported elsewhere, e.g. Leicester City £92m, Newcastle United £73m and Tottenham £61m.

Chelsea’s business model is far more reliant on player sales than any other major English club. In the last five years, Chelsea made nearly half a billion pounds from this activity, including good money from Academy graduates, who represent pure profit in the books. This included three years when they generated more than £100m, so 2021/22 was no fluke.  Chelsea’s £467m profit from player sales is over £200m more than the next highest clubs in the Premier League, namely Liverpool £263m and Manchester City £254m.

One challenge for the Blues in future is that they now have a huge squad and clearly need to offload players. Other clubs will surely use this to their advantage and look to pick up players for low fees. It is even possible that Chelsea might have to pay players to leave, as Arsenal had to do with Ozil and Aubameyang.

Broadcasting is Chelsea’s most important revenue stream, accounting for 49% of total revenue, ahead of commercial 37% and match day 14%.

Chelsea’s £35m revenue growth in the past three years has been outpaced by Manchester City £78m and Liverpool £61m. On the other hand, the other three members of the Big Six have seen their revenue fall in this period, so Chelsea have not done too badly.

Chelsea’s £481m revenue is the fourth highest in the Premier League, though the gap to the top three clubs is at least £100m. Manchester City lead the way with £613m, followed by Liverpool £594m and Manchester United £583m.

Chelsea have earned an impressive €402m from Europe in the last five years, though this is still a fair way behind Liverpool and Manchester City, who both received €480m. On the other hand, this is a lot higher than Manchester United €322m, Tottenham €256m and Arsenal €125m.    This year they have already earned €94m for reaching the quarter-finals. If they manage to get past Real Madrid, they would receive another €12.5m.

Chelsea’s £177m commercial revenue has been overtaken by Tottenham £183m, while they are miles behind the top three clubs: Manchester City £309m, Manchester United £258m and Liverpool £247m. This will surely be an area of focus for Chelsea’s new owners, who will hope to bring some US expertise to the commercial operations.

It is likely that player trading will continue to be a very important part of Chelsea’s business model for the foreseeable future, partly because their squad is now ridiculously bloated, but also because it is their best chance of complying with FFP regulations (especially if they fail to qualify for the Champions League).

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more