Skip to main content

Chelsea's business model relies on player sales

Chelsea’s pre-tax loss reduced from £156m to £122m, as revenue increased by £46m (11%) from £436m to a club record £481m. The loss would have been even higher without the benefit of £123m profit from player sales, up £95m from the previous season’s £28m.

Chelsea’s £121m pre-tax loss is the second highest in the Premier League, only surpassed by Manchester United’s £150m, though plenty of big losses were reported elsewhere, e.g. Leicester City £92m, Newcastle United £73m and Tottenham £61m.

Chelsea’s business model is far more reliant on player sales than any other major English club. In the last five years, Chelsea made nearly half a billion pounds from this activity, including good money from Academy graduates, who represent pure profit in the books. This included three years when they generated more than £100m, so 2021/22 was no fluke.  Chelsea’s £467m profit from player sales is over £200m more than the next highest clubs in the Premier League, namely Liverpool £263m and Manchester City £254m.

One challenge for the Blues in future is that they now have a huge squad and clearly need to offload players. Other clubs will surely use this to their advantage and look to pick up players for low fees. It is even possible that Chelsea might have to pay players to leave, as Arsenal had to do with Ozil and Aubameyang.

Broadcasting is Chelsea’s most important revenue stream, accounting for 49% of total revenue, ahead of commercial 37% and match day 14%.

Chelsea’s £35m revenue growth in the past three years has been outpaced by Manchester City £78m and Liverpool £61m. On the other hand, the other three members of the Big Six have seen their revenue fall in this period, so Chelsea have not done too badly.

Chelsea’s £481m revenue is the fourth highest in the Premier League, though the gap to the top three clubs is at least £100m. Manchester City lead the way with £613m, followed by Liverpool £594m and Manchester United £583m.

Chelsea have earned an impressive €402m from Europe in the last five years, though this is still a fair way behind Liverpool and Manchester City, who both received €480m. On the other hand, this is a lot higher than Manchester United €322m, Tottenham €256m and Arsenal €125m.    This year they have already earned €94m for reaching the quarter-finals. If they manage to get past Real Madrid, they would receive another €12.5m.

Chelsea’s £177m commercial revenue has been overtaken by Tottenham £183m, while they are miles behind the top three clubs: Manchester City £309m, Manchester United £258m and Liverpool £247m. This will surely be an area of focus for Chelsea’s new owners, who will hope to bring some US expertise to the commercial operations.

It is likely that player trading will continue to be a very important part of Chelsea’s business model for the foreseeable future, partly because their squad is now ridiculously bloated, but also because it is their best chance of complying with FFP regulations (especially if they fail to qualify for the Champions League).

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Millwall punch above their weight

Millwall’s season was overshadowed by the tragic death of owner John Berylson following a car accident. The American had been an exemplary owner, beloved by the fans for his leadership, passion and generosity. Millwall’s finances had been pretty good during his tenure, which we shall explore by looking at the most recent accounts from the 2022/23 season, when the club narrowly missed out on a place in the play-offs after finishing 8th. Millwall’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £12.6m to £12.2m, as revenue rose £0.8m (4%) from £18.6m to a club record £19.4m and player sales improved from a £0.1m loss to £2.5m profit. However, other operating income dropped from by £1.1m from £1.3m to £0.2m, while operating expenses increased £1.7m (5%) from £31.6m to £33.3m. The main driver of the revenue increase was broadcasting, which rose £1.1m (12%) from £9.1m to £10.2m, though match day was also up £0.4m (7%) from £5.8m to £6.2m. In contrast, commercial fell £0.7m (19%) from £3.7m to £3....
Post a Comment
Read more