Skip to main content

Chelsea's business model relies on player sales

Chelsea’s pre-tax loss reduced from £156m to £122m, as revenue increased by £46m (11%) from £436m to a club record £481m. The loss would have been even higher without the benefit of £123m profit from player sales, up £95m from the previous season’s £28m.

Chelsea’s £121m pre-tax loss is the second highest in the Premier League, only surpassed by Manchester United’s £150m, though plenty of big losses were reported elsewhere, e.g. Leicester City £92m, Newcastle United £73m and Tottenham £61m.

Chelsea’s business model is far more reliant on player sales than any other major English club. In the last five years, Chelsea made nearly half a billion pounds from this activity, including good money from Academy graduates, who represent pure profit in the books. This included three years when they generated more than £100m, so 2021/22 was no fluke.  Chelsea’s £467m profit from player sales is over £200m more than the next highest clubs in the Premier League, namely Liverpool £263m and Manchester City £254m.

One challenge for the Blues in future is that they now have a huge squad and clearly need to offload players. Other clubs will surely use this to their advantage and look to pick up players for low fees. It is even possible that Chelsea might have to pay players to leave, as Arsenal had to do with Ozil and Aubameyang.

Broadcasting is Chelsea’s most important revenue stream, accounting for 49% of total revenue, ahead of commercial 37% and match day 14%.

Chelsea’s £35m revenue growth in the past three years has been outpaced by Manchester City £78m and Liverpool £61m. On the other hand, the other three members of the Big Six have seen their revenue fall in this period, so Chelsea have not done too badly.

Chelsea’s £481m revenue is the fourth highest in the Premier League, though the gap to the top three clubs is at least £100m. Manchester City lead the way with £613m, followed by Liverpool £594m and Manchester United £583m.

Chelsea have earned an impressive €402m from Europe in the last five years, though this is still a fair way behind Liverpool and Manchester City, who both received €480m. On the other hand, this is a lot higher than Manchester United €322m, Tottenham €256m and Arsenal €125m.    This year they have already earned €94m for reaching the quarter-finals. If they manage to get past Real Madrid, they would receive another €12.5m.

Chelsea’s £177m commercial revenue has been overtaken by Tottenham £183m, while they are miles behind the top three clubs: Manchester City £309m, Manchester United £258m and Liverpool £247m. This will surely be an area of focus for Chelsea’s new owners, who will hope to bring some US expertise to the commercial operations.

It is likely that player trading will continue to be a very important part of Chelsea’s business model for the foreseeable future, partly because their squad is now ridiculously bloated, but also because it is their best chance of complying with FFP regulations (especially if they fail to qualify for the Champions League).

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/