Skip to main content

Chelsea's business model relies on player sales

Chelsea’s pre-tax loss reduced from £156m to £122m, as revenue increased by £46m (11%) from £436m to a club record £481m. The loss would have been even higher without the benefit of £123m profit from player sales, up £95m from the previous season’s £28m.

Chelsea’s £121m pre-tax loss is the second highest in the Premier League, only surpassed by Manchester United’s £150m, though plenty of big losses were reported elsewhere, e.g. Leicester City £92m, Newcastle United £73m and Tottenham £61m.

Chelsea’s business model is far more reliant on player sales than any other major English club. In the last five years, Chelsea made nearly half a billion pounds from this activity, including good money from Academy graduates, who represent pure profit in the books. This included three years when they generated more than £100m, so 2021/22 was no fluke.  Chelsea’s £467m profit from player sales is over £200m more than the next highest clubs in the Premier League, namely Liverpool £263m and Manchester City £254m.

One challenge for the Blues in future is that they now have a huge squad and clearly need to offload players. Other clubs will surely use this to their advantage and look to pick up players for low fees. It is even possible that Chelsea might have to pay players to leave, as Arsenal had to do with Ozil and Aubameyang.

Broadcasting is Chelsea’s most important revenue stream, accounting for 49% of total revenue, ahead of commercial 37% and match day 14%.

Chelsea’s £35m revenue growth in the past three years has been outpaced by Manchester City £78m and Liverpool £61m. On the other hand, the other three members of the Big Six have seen their revenue fall in this period, so Chelsea have not done too badly.

Chelsea’s £481m revenue is the fourth highest in the Premier League, though the gap to the top three clubs is at least £100m. Manchester City lead the way with £613m, followed by Liverpool £594m and Manchester United £583m.

Chelsea have earned an impressive €402m from Europe in the last five years, though this is still a fair way behind Liverpool and Manchester City, who both received €480m. On the other hand, this is a lot higher than Manchester United €322m, Tottenham €256m and Arsenal €125m.    This year they have already earned €94m for reaching the quarter-finals. If they manage to get past Real Madrid, they would receive another €12.5m.

Chelsea’s £177m commercial revenue has been overtaken by Tottenham £183m, while they are miles behind the top three clubs: Manchester City £309m, Manchester United £258m and Liverpool £247m. This will surely be an area of focus for Chelsea’s new owners, who will hope to bring some US expertise to the commercial operations.

It is likely that player trading will continue to be a very important part of Chelsea’s business model for the foreseeable future, partly because their squad is now ridiculously bloated, but also because it is their best chance of complying with FFP regulations (especially if they fail to qualify for the Champions League).

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do