Skip to main content

Will United ever be sold?

The Glazers put Manchester United on the market in November because they were led to believe the news would spark a competitive auction between private-equity giants, sovereign wealth funds and assorted trophy asset hunters. The pitch was that at least one of these bidders would decide they simply must have Manchester United or they would never be able to show their faces in Davos again. This would trigger a bid of more than $8billion (£6.1bn).

Instead, they got a two-horse race between bidders more worried about not being able to show their faces in Davos again if they spent much more than $6billion (£4.6billion) on a company that had a market capitalisation of less than half that figure the day before the auction was announced. Fear of looking daft has trumped fear of missing out.

It can be reasonably sure that both bidders have settled on a number close to $6.5billion (£5bn).

The Qatari bid says it will clear the debts immediately without taking on further borrowing. The INEOS bid has not made that commitment and its history in business suggests it will borrow more money to buy the club and refinance the debt via corporate bonds. This borrowing will most likely sit on the parent company’s books, not the club’s, with INEOS paying the interest.

In truth, this does not make much difference to the Glazers, as both approaches add up to almost the same amount of money for their shares.

However, INEOS is only proposing to buy the Glazers’ shares — or even just enough of them to take control — while Sheikh Jassim wants all of the shares, including the 31 per cent that is owned by investors who bought into United since they were partially floated on the New York Stock Exchange in 2012.

This makes a huge difference, as Sheikh Jassim could be shelling out almost twice as much as INEOS is initially proposing.

We are one year closer to a new format for the Champions League in the 2024-25 season, when the Premier League should get an extra place in the competition and participating clubs more games and more money. And at the end of that season, FIFA’s’s new and improved Club World Cup will take place for the first time in the United States, with 12 slots for European teams.

That might be worth sticking around for, and who knows? Apple or one of the other tech giants might be ready to really blow things up with a mega offer for the Premier League’s media rights.

Will United be sold and to whom?   I don’t know or nor does anyone really.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/