United better able to meet financial challenges

Manchester United have announced financial results for the first half of 2023/24, incorporating the first six months of the season which cover July to December 2023, in other words before Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s purchase of a minority stake.

Manchester United’s pre-tax loss narrowed from £25m to just £6m, as revenue increased by £72m (23%) from £311m to a first half record of £383m and profit on player sales more than doubled from £14m to £30m. However, this was accompanied by operating expenses rising £52m (16%) to £383m, while net interest payable also increased by £16m (85%) from £19m to £35m.

The revenue growth was driven by the return to the Champions League, which drove large increases in both broadcasting, up £52m (55%) from £94m to £146m, and match day, up £24m (47%) from £51m to £75m. This was partially offset by lower commercial, which fell £4m (2%) from £166m to £162m.

The impact of interest payable on United’s accounts is striking, amounting to £35m in the first half, which represents a significant increase over the previous comparative periods. This is partly due to rising interest rates, but largely because the majority of the club’s debt is denominated in USD and unhedged. Therefore, the weakening in the Pound against the Dollar has led to higher interest charges in the club’s accounts, which are reported in Sterling.

This is the third season in a row that Manchester United have reported a pre-tax loss in H1. Revenues and costs are not evenly phased during the financial year, but it is perhaps worth noting that the previous season’s £25m loss after the first six months ultimately became a £33m loss for the full season.

However, United’s bean counters will be gratified that their first half loss has rebounded a little this season, though it is still nowhere near as good as their performance in the years up to 2021, when they regularly generated large profits.

Player sales

United’s profit from player sales increased from £14m to £30m, mainly thanks to the moves of Dean Henderson to Crystal Palace, Anthony Elanga to Nottingham Forest and Fred to Fenerbahce. This was United’s best result from player trading for many a year, but it remains relatively low by Premier League standards. They didn’t make any major sales in the January window, so this gain will only improve if they register more deals before the 30th June accounting close.

Looking at player sales profits in the five years up to 2021/22, we can see that United’s £92m was firmly in the bottom half of the Premier League, miles below the likes of Chelsea £467m, Liverpool £263m and Manchester City £254m.

United’s H1 revenue increased by £72m (23%) from £311m to £383m, which was a club high for the first half, boosted by a new record in match day. The club has maintained its revenue forecast of £635-665m for the 2023/24 season, though this is £15m lower than the initial outlook of £650-680m, again because of the early Champions League exit.

The difference in United’s earnings in the seasons when they qualify for the Champions League is obvious. For example, the Swiss Ramble estimates that United will earn €60m this season from the Champions League, even after their disastrous fourth place finish in the group, which meant that they didn’t even avail themselves of the safety net of dropping down to the Europa League. That is around twice as much as the €33m they received last season in the Europe League, even though they went further by getting as far as the quarter-finals.

United’s wage bill increased by £25m (16%) from £160m to £185m, mainly due to higher bonus payments as a result of qualifying for the Champions League, allied with investment in the squad and contract extensions.

The club still has to confront a number of financial issues, as shown in these figures for the first half of the season. Despite setting a new revenue record, the fact remains that United still posted a pre-tax loss, while the second half of the year will lose the benefit of Champions League income.

Furthermore, the club’s operational cash outflow had to be funded by taking on an additional £160m of debt. As a result, total debt shot up to around £1.1 bln, including a huge amount owed for transfers, though Sir Jim’s money has since reduced this by £120m.

In conclusion, there will be no shortage of challenges facing the new management team, but at least there is now a willingness to do something about them.

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day ...

Spurs to sell minority stake

Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog