Why City fans are unhappy

Last week Manchester City announced an average season ticket price rise of five per cent — with some as high as 11 per cent

During conversations between The Athletic and supporters’ groups, complaints about the club’s ticket costs have crossed over into other concerns, including:

Limited impact of fan feedback at the club
Increased ticket prices and controversial sales criteria for matches
Flat atmospheres at the Etihad Stadium
A boycott of the official ticket resale platform
Concerns about the new ‘flexi-gold’ season ticket initiative
Increase to a minimum-attendance clause on season tickets

All four main City fan groups — the Official Supporters Club, the 1894 Group, MCFC Fans Foodbank Support (FFS) and City Matters, the club’s fan engagement programme — voiced their opposition to the increases.

Justifying the decision to increase the cost of season tickets, City pointed out that they offer season tickets starting at £120 for under-18s, enabling younger fans easier access to matches.

The increase in prices is put down to rising operating costs connected to inflation and City say that, on average, the price increases amount to £2.30 per match for adult season ticket holders and under £1 for juniors.

That is a price that most fans are prepared to pay, begrudgingly or otherwise. Many believe that the quality of football — with the team winning three Premier League titles in a row, and a treble of trophies last season — justifies the rise.

It is a common view among the fanbase that, with those record profits in mind, City could have frozen ticket prices because the impact on supporters far outweighs the impact on the club.

A spokesperson for 1894 says: “They’re making a huge profit and this would have been an easy win to keep fans onside.

Some estimates suggest that even if every season ticket went up by £50, the club would stand to generate just under £2m in extra income, which represents about 0.25 per cent of total revenues and is deemed, by some fans, insignificant compared to the goodwill that freezing prices would generate.

In the boardroom, where executives are charged with growing revenues, that kind of increase would be welcomed, and the reality behind City’s decision is that they are running a business.

Despite income from prize money and sponsorships soaring, City still make less money from matchdays than their rivals. That is likely to be the case for some time yet given the London clubs can charge far greater sums due to the economics of living in the capital. As for United and Liverpool, they have massive global fanbases that City cannot yet rival.

The other reality of the situation is that many other Premier League clubs have announced price increases for next season, knowing that most fans will pay if they have the money. Those who can’t afford to go to City matches any more, or attempt to make a stand for better conditions, as demonstrated at Wembley last summer, will be replaced by those who can.

A week on from the decision to increase prices, there is also annoyance among supporters that City are yet to explain their decision or engage in further conversation about

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful. Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy). However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch. Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog