Skip to main content

Alternative buyers for Everton could be found

Alternative buyers for Everton could be found very quickly if the increasingly troubled deal with 777 partners fell through: https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/everton-takeover-alternative-buyers-could-29115644

777 partners have been accused of fraud in a civil filing in a court in New York: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/articles/cprgxj4zlneo

The complainant this time is London-based investment firm Leadenhall and the civil suit it has filed against 777 Partners, some of its portfolio companies, its co-owners Steven Pasko and Josh Wander, its close partner A-Cap and its boss Kenneth King runs to 82 pages. And there is a wounding zinger on each page.

But perhaps the easiest place to start is simply to say this must surely be the end of 777’s almost eight-month attempt to complete its purchase of Everton, and very possibly the end of 777, too.

The allegations are staggering, although to many they will not really come as a huge surprise.

After all, Leadenhall’s complaint, which was filed in a U.S. district court in New York on Friday, notes that 777 and its associated companies are already the subject of 16 different lawsuits over unpaid debts totalling more than $130million ($104m). Leadenhall, for what it is worth, says it is owed more than $600m by the group.

Leadenhall says 777 and its affiliates owe A-Cap more than $2billion, not that it thinks A-Cap itself deserves any sympathy, as Leadenhall believes A-Cap is in on the scam.

The central allegation is that 777 and its associated companies set up a credit facility with Leadenhall in 2021 that was secured against assets that had to be “free and clear” of all other potential claims. And the unencumbered status of these assets had to be confirmed to Leadenhall by the group every month. This enabled the 777 group to borrow lots of money from Leadenhall, at a relatively low interest rate.

However, a combination of anonymous tip-offs, forensic accounting, conversations with other lenders and, even, admissions from 777’s main man Wander himself led Leadenhall to the conclusion that what was going on here was “a giant shell game, at best, and an outright Ponzi scheme, at worst”.

Instead of “free and clear”, most of 777’s collateral either did not exist or it was “double-pledged”. Oh, and the borrowers forged documents and faked records to hide its deception, Leadenhall claims.

The plan, as far as Leadenhall can fathom, was to funnel money, usually borrowed money, into “speculative bets” on airlines, payday lenders and football clubs, with Everton being the biggest and most important bet of all.

777 have declined to comment but their usual line is they never comment on ongoing litigation.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/