Skip to main content

What effects would spending cap have?

All-star games, closed leagues and overseas matches may all be off the table for now, but the English Premier League is feeling more American by the day.

On Monday, the majority of clubs voted in favour of drawing up full proposals for a hard spending cap that would be tied to the TV income of the league’s bottom club — a system known as anchoring. A formal plan could be put to a binding vote as early as next month.

Spending caps have been one of the key structural factors in ensuring the financial success of US sports leagues. They prevent the wealthiest teams from simply amassing all the talent and blowing the competition away on the field, and help bake in margins by keeping a lid on costs. Incidentally, the Premier League’s two richest clubs by revenue — Manchester United and Manchester City — reportedly voted against the plan.

If introduced to the Premier League, the short-term effects of such a cap may be limited. Analysis from football finance guru Kieran Maguire suggests that only one club — Chelsea — would currently fall foul of a limit pegged at 5 times the broadcast revenue of the lowest ranked team. In fact, most teams would gain extra headroom to spend. And the rules wouldn’t change until the 2025/26 season.

Over a longer horizon, the impact on the business model of football could be quite profound. Just as domestic TV revenue is stalling, anchoring should apply a firm brake to wage and transfer fee inflation — costs that have outstripped income growth for years and left European football with mounting debts and stubborn losses. It should also temper the financial power of state-backed clubs.

Combined with Uefa’s squad cost rule, which sets a limit of how much a club can spend on players relative to its income, a hard spending limit lays a potential path ahead to profits. That in turn should help increase club valuations, a key objective for many owners.

There is still some way to go. Players’ unions will fight tooth and nail to block anything they see as a salary cap. And Premier League clubs may yet get cold feet about doing anything that gives European rivals the chance to catch up or cements the dominance of the big teams.

But that the very idea of a hard spending cap has got this far shows just how quickly the mindset in football is changing.

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow
Post a Comment
Read more

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is
Post a Comment
Read more

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/
Post a Comment
Read more