Skip to main content

What effects would spending cap have?

All-star games, closed leagues and overseas matches may all be off the table for now, but the English Premier League is feeling more American by the day.

On Monday, the majority of clubs voted in favour of drawing up full proposals for a hard spending cap that would be tied to the TV income of the league’s bottom club — a system known as anchoring. A formal plan could be put to a binding vote as early as next month.

Spending caps have been one of the key structural factors in ensuring the financial success of US sports leagues. They prevent the wealthiest teams from simply amassing all the talent and blowing the competition away on the field, and help bake in margins by keeping a lid on costs. Incidentally, the Premier League’s two richest clubs by revenue — Manchester United and Manchester City — reportedly voted against the plan.

If introduced to the Premier League, the short-term effects of such a cap may be limited. Analysis from football finance guru Kieran Maguire suggests that only one club — Chelsea — would currently fall foul of a limit pegged at 5 times the broadcast revenue of the lowest ranked team. In fact, most teams would gain extra headroom to spend. And the rules wouldn’t change until the 2025/26 season.

Over a longer horizon, the impact on the business model of football could be quite profound. Just as domestic TV revenue is stalling, anchoring should apply a firm brake to wage and transfer fee inflation — costs that have outstripped income growth for years and left European football with mounting debts and stubborn losses. It should also temper the financial power of state-backed clubs.

Combined with Uefa’s squad cost rule, which sets a limit of how much a club can spend on players relative to its income, a hard spending limit lays a potential path ahead to profits. That in turn should help increase club valuations, a key objective for many owners.

There is still some way to go. Players’ unions will fight tooth and nail to block anything they see as a salary cap. And Premier League clubs may yet get cold feet about doing anything that gives European rivals the chance to catch up or cements the dominance of the big teams.

But that the very idea of a hard spending cap has got this far shows just how quickly the mindset in football is changing.

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more