Skip to main content

Chelsea's ownership structure

Todd Boehly has been, for many outsiders, the face of the American consortium that paid £2.3billion ($3bn) to acquire Chelsea from sanctioned Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich in May 2022, but the ugly public fallout from his breakdown in relations with majority shareholders Clearlake Capital — and in particular the private equity firm’s co-founder Behdad Eghbali — has exposed that he is not the main driver of decision-making at Stamford Bridge.

Clearlake largely flew under the radar during the Chelsea sale process, but its 61.5 per cent stake in BlueCo — the parent company set up by the consortium that also includes Ligue 1 club Strasbourg among its assets — meant its influence on the club’s strategy was baked into the original ownership arrangement. As its most visible and actively engaged representative at Stamford Bridge and Cobham, Eghbali has been the most powerful figure for the last 18 months.

Boehly retains veto power as co-controlling owner; all major Chelsea decisions require formal sign-off from him, Eghbali and Clearlake co-founder Jose E Feliciano. But the club’s direction on the sporting and business sides has been dominated by Clearlake since Boehly relinquished the ‘interim sporting director’ title he assumed for the owners’ first transfer window in the summer of 2022 and stepped back from day-to-day operations.

Clearlake and Boehly signed a commitment as part of the purchase agreement in 2022 not to sell Chelsea for at least 10 years, but there is nothing to prevent them from trading shares with each other. There are also questions of how that commitment would be enforced, given that the UK government has since changed and the demand for it to be a condition of sale came from Abramovich, who remains a sanctioned individual.

The shares owned by Clearlake are Class A senior while those owned by Boehly, Walter and Wyss are Class B junior, meaning they are exposed to first loss if the parent company loses value. However, both classes of shares are guaranteed the same rate of return if they are sold — an important detail to note in a situation where either side could buy out the other.

Founded in 2006 by Eghbali, Feliciano and Steven Chang, Clearlake is a private equity firm headquartered in Santa Monica, California, that has around $80billion of assets under management and is ranked the 16th-biggest private equity firm in the world by Private Equity International.

Chelsea is the only sports team among the 50 companies in the current investment portfolio listed on the firm’s website, though Strasbourg is also under the BlueCo umbrella owned by Clearlake, Boehly, Walter and Wyss.

Since the bulk of their investment in Chelsea comes from Clearlake’s private equity funds, the personal shareholdings of Eghbali and Feliciano are lower than that of Boehly. The firm is not required to publicly disclose the identities of the investors who have stakes in the club through its funds, and may never do so.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's no deal say Spurs insiders over Taiwanese takeover

Senior figures at Tottenham Hotspur insisted on Friday that they had not been informed of any deal to sell Daniel Levy’s stake in the club. A business group, Eight Sports Capital — which is said to include a billionaire Taiwanese financier — claimed that it had an agreement in place to buy a 24.99 per cent stake in ENIC, the club’s majority owners, from Levy, who owns 29.88 per cent. The Times has been told Ng Wing Fai and Brooklyn Earick form part of the group, having both been linked previously to potential takeovers of the Premier League club. The Taiwanese businessman, Richard Tsai, is also said to be part of the consortium. He is reportedly worth £7 billion.  Last year Earick, the former DJ and tech entrepreneur, was part of an attempted £4.5 billion takeover, which was “unequivocally rejected” by Spurs.  An ENIC spokesperson said: “We can confirm that neither ENIC nor THFC are aware of any sale by Daniel Levy’s Family Trust of its minority stake in ENIC, THFC’...

Reports about Charlton sale exaggerated

Reports have appeared in The Guardian and elsewhere that Charlton has been put up for sale. Richard Cawley is an authoritative local journalist who runs a South London Sport substack site.  He reached out to the club yesterday evening to ask for comment on The Guardian’s article. Early indications from the club have been that nothing has changed since the story about them seeking investment, except that it is now a different company doing it. Charlton have since managed to consolidate their place in the Championship, avoiding an instant return to League One, with their women’s side promoted to the WSL, returning to the top flight for the first time since 2007, although staying there is likely to be costly. It would be counter-intuitive for owners Global Football Partners not to progress the club when looking for investment, that the focus remains on driving it forward, that their spend this summer is in line with long-term planning and will see an increase in wages spent on players...

Hull City's 'strange' loan

When football finance guru Kieran Maguire seems flashing lights in a club's loan deal, I become concerned.  He is the leading football finance expert in the UK. Hull City have borrowed £55m against their stadium and training ground yet they should get £30m from the Premier League before long.  What is going on? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpwel48y51do