Skip to main content

Club World Cup will be good for Chelsea

Fifa has finally answered one of the key questions around the upcoming relaunch of the Club World Cup — how much it pays. On Wednesday the competition organiser revealed its prize money schedule, with payments based both on turning up and actually winning matches. 

Considering the rates were negotiated with the European Club Association, it’s perhaps little surprise that the bulk of the purse is heading to the top European clubs. Some are promised $38.5mn before a ball has even been kicked, with potential earnings for winning the tournament of $125mn when ends on July 13.

Fifa has made a lot of noise about the Club World Cup being a chance to spread some of football’s wealth beyond Uefa’s sphere of influence. The month-long competition will feature 32 teams from around the globe who qualified largely based on performance in regional tournaments.

Yet the financial impact will be felt differently depending on where a team hails from.  Assuming — perhaps unfairly — that Auckland FC fails to win or draw any of its group games against Bayern Munich, Benfica or Boca Juniors, then the only entrant from Oceania will go home with just $3.6mn. Subtract the costs of competing (eg travel), and that probably doesn’t leave a lot of change.

Teams from Asia, Africa, and North America fare a bit better, with each guaranteed $9.55mn for participating. Even if they lose all their games, the tournament will still deliver an annual revenue boost this year of more than 10 per cent for teams the size of the Seattle Sounders and Urawa Red Diamonds.

Fluminense fans will probably fancy their chances of bagging some points against South Africa’s Mamelodi Sundowns and South Korean side Ulsan HD. South American teams will get at least $15.55mn for showing up, while qualification to the second round would bring an extra $7.5mn. That’s more than double the money on offer from winning the Brazilian league, and starts to look similar to the pay-off from victory in the Copa Libertadores — South America’s version of the Champions League.

For top European clubs, the money is decent to start with, but not transformative. Cash for participating equates to around 3.5 per cent of Real Madrid’s annual income, 5 per cent for Bayern Munich, and 7 per cent for Chelsea.  A nice boost, but not massive.

Heftier sums come from making progress. Winning all three group stages and reaching the semi-final bags a top club more than $80mn.  For a club like Chelsea that could do with a financial sugar rush to help balance this year’s spending, the Club World Cup will be hugely welcome.

By backloading so much for winners, Fifa has also built in a serious financial incentive for actually lifting the Tiffany-designed Club World Cup. Competition should be fierce.

But it’s worth remembering this event (for now at least) will only take place once every four years. Only a tiny group of teams are virtually guaranteed to qualify again (Real Madrid, Manchester City, Bayern Munich, Paris Saint-Germain) — all of whom already feature in the top five richest clubs in the world.

So yes, there’s some trickle down economics at play. But ultimately, if the Club World Cup succeeds, the world’s wealthiest clubs that benefit.

Fifa's motivations

The Club World Cup is Fifa’s attempt to reduce its financial reliance on the men’s World Cup. The month-long tournament, an updated and much enlarged version of a long-standing exhibition tournament, will be hosted in cities across the US. There will be 63 matches involving 32 teams.

Liverpool, Manchester United and Barcelona, three of the most popular teams in the world, did not qualify, while Fifa has faced criticism for giving a place to Inter Miami, home of Argentine superstar Lionel Messi. Miami won the most points during the regular season, but LA Galaxy were crowned US champions after winning the play-offs. Fifa said it considered a range of qualification criteria in consultation with the US league.

On the commercial front, broadcasters and sponsors have been reluctant to back an event with little name recognition, particularly as many had not budgeted for additional spending during what was due to be a relatively quiet summer for sport.

Some in the footballing world have also voiced doubts about how many people will tune in to watch top European club teams face relative minnows from countries such as South Korea, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates. However, some earlier stumbles have been overcome. In December, Fifa sealed a $1bn deal with streaming company DAZN to show the cup globally free-to-view.

After a slow start, Fifa has signed four sponsors for the cup, with Chinese electronics maker Hisense and Bank of America joining long-term commercial partners Coca-Cola and AB InBev. The most recent World Cup in Qatar had fourteen. One person involved in the competition said the target for the commercial programme was up to a dozen sponsors.

Last month, Fifa boss Infantino took the trophy — a dish made up of concentric rings that can be unlocked by a golden key — to the Oval Office to show Donald Trump, and invited the US president to present it to the champions on July 13. “It’s beautiful,” said Trump. “I’ve never seen anything like it.”

 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more