Crystal Palace had lost their appeal to the Court for Arbitration in Sport in Lausanne against demotion from the Europa League: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c1kzzpp04kgo
I am yet to read the judgment, but it is what I expected. This is about the letter of the law rather than justice and fairness.
The summary of the decision states: 'The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has dismissed an appeal by Crystal Palace FC (CPFC) against UEFA, Nottingham Forest FC and Olympique Lyonnais (OL) concerning a decision by UEFA to remove CPFC from the UEFA Europa League 2025/2026 due to a breach of UEFA multi club ownership regulations.
As a result, CPFC will be admitted to compete in the UEFA
Conference League 2025/2026. The appeal sought to annul the decision by the
UEFA Club Financial Control Body on 11 July 2025 which found CPFC and OL
non-compliant with multi club ownership regulations.
Alongside the
annulment of the decision, CPFC requested readmission to the UEFA Europa League
with Nottingham Forest or OL’s admission rejected.
An in-person hearing took place at CAS headquarters in
Lausanne, Switzerland on 8 August 2025. The CAS Panel was composed of Prof.
Luigi Fumagalli as President (Italy), Mr Manfred P. Nan (the Netherlands) and
Mr Olivier Carrard (Switzerland).
After considering the evidence, the Panel found that John
Textor, founder of Eagle Football Holdings, had shares in CPFC and OL and was a
Board member with decisive influence over both clubs at the time of UEFA’s
assessment date. The Panel also dismissed the argument by CPFC that they
received unfair treatment in comparison to Nottingham Forest and OL.
The Panel considered
that the UEFA Regulations are clear and do not provide flexibility to clubs
that are non-compliant on the assessment date, as CPFC claimed. This was an
expedited procedure, with an operative decision rendered two and a half weeks
after the appeal, filed on 21 July 2025. Unless Parties request
confidentiality, a full Award (with grounds) will be made available on the CAS
website in due course.'
Palace are said to be considering their legal options, but I do not think they have many with time runing out.
Comments
Post a Comment