Skip to main content

The perils of sponsorship

Premier League clubs are keen to boost their commercial income by attracting new sponsors, not least from the lucrative and still under exploited Asian market. However, they can get themselves in hot water by doing so as Liverpool FC have found.

In July they thought they had found an environmentally friendly winner when they signed up a company that produces mineral water at a Tibetan glacier. The Hong Kong-listed Tibet Water Company became the club's 'official water partner' in China in July. In return the company was promised digital media rights and access to players.

However, the Free Tibet Group has started a campaign against Liverpool's partnership, arguing that by working with the company the club was in effect condoning human rights abuses stemming from China's occupation of Tibet in 1950: Campaign

Beijing considers that Tibet is an inseparable part of China, although it operates as an autonomous region. The Chinese Government says that it faces a dangerous separatist movement. China's position on Tibet as summarised by the BBC can be found here: China's perspective

The campaign manager for Free Tibet, John Jones, said there was no suggestion that Tibet Water was directly involved in human rights abuses, but claimed that the company was benefiting from China's occupation of the region. He told the Financial Times that he had raised his concerns privately with the club, but had received no response.

Tibet Water has been a high profile sponsor of entertainment and sports in China as well as winning contracts to be the official provider of bottled water to high-level Communist Party meetings. The mineral water is taken from a glacial spring in the Nyenchen Tangla mountains in Tibet and bottled at facilities close by.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/