Skip to main content

The long Chinese march into football

China's long march into football forms part of a 'soft power' strategy, but it may not pay off and Chinese investment in European clubs may now be past its peak.

Chinese tycoons have invested more than $2.5bn in European clubs over the past three years from giants like Manchester City and AC Milan to smaller outfits such as FC Sochaux in France and Northampton Town. The most expensive investment was $797m to buy AC Milan, followed by $400m for a 13 per cent stake in Manchester City and $270m to buy Southampton.

For the Chinese government it's part of a wider strategy to increase the country's soft power and earn China its rightful place on the world stage. Powerful leader President Xi Jinping told the Communist Party's five-yearly congress last month that the 'extensive development' of competitive sports had helped boost the appeal of China's 'underlying values', increasing its 'soft power and influence'.

However, exporting soft power is not easy for China's communist party because of its overt rejection of democratic values, its record on human rights and intensifying clampdown on criticism. Even so, supporters of a club successfully backed by a Chinese investor may be prepared to disregard this harder edge to its policies.

However, previous waves of football club acquisitions by US, Russian and Middle Eastern buyers have done little to improve perceptions of these countries. In some cases, they have damaged them.

What are the motives of the individual Chinese investors? An important one is to win political credit with Mr Xi and the party hierarchy. It is thought that the overseas investments would help China to gain experience and expertise to develop its domestic game.

Some purchasers had a more commercial motivation. They hoped to use cheap financing to buy clubs before selling them on for a profit.

The motivations of some investors is clearer than others. CMC, Wanda and Fosun see European football as a high profile element of a growing media and entertainment business. When Rastar Group, a manufacturer of remote controlled cars, acquired Barcelona's second team Espanyol, it was seen as a part of a broader expansion into entertainment, along with the purchase of a gaming company. After rescuing the club from financial difficulties, Rastar restored it to profitability.

However, the Chinese Government became concerned about the high capital outflows resulting from the purchase of foreign clubs. Mr Xi grew wary of his name being linked with questionable deals. If a Chinese owned club ran into financial difficulties, that would be damaging for the country's reputation. Analysts expect the flood of Chinese football deals to slow to a trickle over the next couple of years, unless there is a change in government policy.

The Chinese Super League

Tycoons have also pumped several billion dollars into the Chinese Super League in response to President Xi's call to transform the game. CSL teams spent more than $450m on transfer fees last year, more than double the figure in some European leagues including France.

Average attendances have risen by more than 60 per cent to 25,000 since 2010 and more fans attend the average CSL game than top flight matches in the French and Dutch leagues. Sky Sports started showing the CSL last year in a sign of growing global interest. However, all clubs continue to be loss making.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/