Skip to main content

A Chinese puzzle

Just what should we make of the Chinese Super League (CSL)? Is a fair basis of comparison the development of soccer in the United States? Both have a penchant for signing 'marquee' players, big or fairly big names who are past the peak of their careers, but might still attract the crowds.

Thus, defender José Fonte has agreed a £4.3m move from West Ham United to Dalian Yifang. The 34-year old is likely to earn about £120,000 a week after tax. He had 17 months left on his £70,000 a week West Ham contract. However, he has not played since October because of an ankle injury.

The political environment in China is a lot more complex than the United States, or at least less transparent. A few years ago I spent a fascinating few days at a workshop on government-business relations in China in Beijing. I learnt a lot, but I also realised how much I didn't know or understand.

Jonathan Sullivan of the University of Nottingham aptly commented that the business environment and policy-making in China is the result of a mix of 'top-down experimentation, exploitation of loopholes, unintended consequences, ad hoc reactions and political imperatives.' Not so different from the UK and the US really!

Ultimately the Communist Party calls the shots. But there is room for initiatives at local level and there is plenty of scope for rich and powerful businessmen as long as they do not challenge the authority of the Party.

President Xi saw football as a way of exerting soft power, alongside the development of economic and military power by the People's Republic. But it didn't all quite go to plan with big capital outflows and not enough investment in developing local talent so as to build up the national team. Hence, clubs have been reined in and the global impact of Chinese spending in the transfer market is not as great as it was.

The Chinese FA, which is under government control, has brought in a tax of 100 per cent on transfers worth more than $7m. Consequently, Javier Mascherano's transfer to Hebei China Fortune was just below the $7m tax threshold. In the two previous winter transfer windows, the CSL spent more on transfers than any other league. This winter they spent $86m, down from $500m, and well behind the €600m spent by Premier League clubs. This led in turn to a 30 per cent cut in the value of CSL television rights.

Attendances had been going up, but there is a concern that they will now go into reverse. All 16 clubs are loss making, but then it took 14 seasons for the Premier League to become profitable. Optimists insist that the CSL is still at an early stage of its development. Much will depend on the political climate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/