Unravelling Chelsea's accounts

This is not a straightforward matter as Chelsea has a particularly complex structure with a large number of subsidiaries (see complete list below). Here we focus on the ultimate parent company, Fordstam Limited.

The loss for the year to 30 June 2017 was £13.8m compared to a loss of £84.5m for the prior year. Increased revenues and player sales were the principal reasons for the improvement.

Turnover increased from £334.6m to a record £367.8m. 'This was due to an increase in the broadcasting revenues because of increased centralised distributions from the Premier League (a £19.5m increase) together with an increase in sponsorship income due to additional agreements being signed in the year (a £17.8m increase), principally the start of our new training wear partnership with Carabao. Match income was slightly down reflecting our non-participation in European competition (a £4.1m reduction).'

Broadcasting income accounts for 44 per cent of revenue. Commercial revenue accounts for 38 per cent.

'The football club made a profit on player trading of £69.2m in the year (2016: £49m) principally due to the sales of Oscar to Shanghai SIPG, Christian Atsu to Newcastle, Patrick Bamford to Middlesbrough, Papy Diilobodji to Sunderland and Juan Cuadrado to Juventus.'

Staff costs were 60 per cent of turnover, an acceptable figure. Wage costs actually fell because of the absence of European bonuses.

Creditors falling due after one year amount to over £1 billion at £1,117.2m. This includes £1,086.4m on a loan repayable on eighteen months' notice to a 'related party', i.e., Roman Abramovich. He paid £1,028,000 for his corporate box. Let's hope the catering was up to scratch.

Kieran Maguire of the Price of Football has commented,'Seems odd that Chelsea FC loan of over £1.2 billion from Abramovich has been transferred from his BVI company Lindeza Worldwide to one called Camberley Investments Ltd, set up in December 2017 in Hayes. Middlesex and with only one £1 share prior to acquiring the loan.' In March Mr Abramovich filed a declaration that he was now a resident of Russia.

The subsidiary companies are as follows:

Chelsea FC plc, holding company
Stamford Bridge Projects Limited, restaurant operation
Chelsea Car Parks Limited, car park management
The Hotel at Chelsea Limited, hotel management
Chelsea FC Merchandising Limited, merchandising, mail order and publications
Chelsea FC Pte Limited, registered at 21 Merchant Road, Singapore, sales office
Chelsea Football Club Limited, professional football club
Chelsea TV Limited, dormant
Chelsea Limited, dormant
Chelsea Ladies' Football Club Limited, professional football club
Under the Bridge Limited, music venue
Chelsea Leisure Services Limited, health and fitness club/visitor attraction
Stamford Bridge Securities Limited, property holding

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month. He was approaching ninety, but still went to games. Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules. Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000. The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts. Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved: https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen. There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere: https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/

The Political Economy of Football V2

Search This Blog