Skip to main content

Usamov may sell Arsenal stake

Arsenal fans fear that they will be further sidelined if Alisher Usmanov sells his 30 per cent stake to majority shareholder Stan Kroenke. Usmanov has explored selling his stake after accepting that his rival will not let him take full control.

Kroenke owns a 67 per cent stake in Arsenal and there are fears of a reduction in transparency if he acquires the club outright. Were Kroenke to reach a 90 per cent stake, the remaining shareholders would be obliged to sell to him and he could then delist the club from the stock exchange. It is possible that the club's legal status could be transferred to the United States.

In a statement referring to Stan Kroenke's refusal to engage with supporters, the Arsenal Supporters' Trust said: 'Arsenal is too important to be owned by any one person and there should be a plurality of ownership, including supporters.'

Mr Usmanov has said he is willing to sell to any party - other than Mr Kroenke - who 'shares my and undoubtedly the majority of fans' vision for the club.' However, this is a difficult sales pitch: he does not have a board seat at Arsenal or any say over the running of the club. Any new shareholder is likely to face the same problems with Mr Kroenke effectively in control.

Last October Mr Usmanov turned down a £525m offer from Mr Kroenke for his shareholding. A few months earlier Mr Usmanov made a $1.3bn bid to acquire Mr Kroenke's stake which was rejected.

Mr Usmanov first acquired shares in Arsenal in 2007, teaming up with Anglo-Iranian businessman Farhad Moshiri to buy a 14.6 per cent stake for £75m. In 2016, Mr Usmanov increased his stake to 30 per cent, buying out Mr Moshiri.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/