Skip to main content

Spurs face choices about where to stage games

Spurs will not move into their new stadium until mid-October due to issues with 'critical safety systems', thought to relate to electrical systems and fire alarms. Such difficulties are not unusual with large and complex construction projects, but they leave the club with some difficult choices about future games.

They must tell Uefa within a fortnight where they will play their home group games in the Champions League. Although the stadium could be ready for their second and third group games, the first of which is October 23rd, Uefa demand certainty. The safe option would be to play all three games at Wembley.

Spurs have asked for the Premier League games on September 15 against Liverpool and October 6 against Cardiff to be moved to Wembley. The game against Manchester City on October 28 cannot be moved to Wembley because the stadium is hosting a NFL game which is sold out. They could ask Manchester City and the Premier League to reverse the fixture, but this would need the agreement of Greater Manchester Police. The other alternative would be to postpone the game, but given fixture congestion for Premier League clubs, this would only be allowed as a last resort.

A further 200 workers were brought on to the site on Sunday, some of them lured from Crossrail by higher pay. The cladding has yet to be finished and it is thought that the crane will be on site until October. Before a safety certificate can be granted there have to be two test events with increasing attendances.

The Tottenham Hotspur Supporters Trust is asking for a full refund plus a goodwill gesture in cash for supporters with tickets for the Cardiff and Liverpool games. Refunds for this Saturday's game against Fulham have been offered in club credit only.

Spurs have now been given a fortnight to decide whether they stage their match against Manchester City on October 28th.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wolves get raw deal from FFP

  I used to see a lifelong Wolves fan for lunch once a month.   He was approaching ninety, but still went to games.   Sadly he passed away the other week. As football finance guru Kieran Maguire has noted, Wolves continue to be constrained by financial fair play rules.  Radio 4 this morning described them as this year's 'crisis club' and the pessimists have certainly been piling in. Martin Samuel wrote sympathetically in the Sunday Times yesterday, saying that the Premier League drives talent away with regulatory red tape: 'Why could Al-Hilal sign Neves? Because Wolves needed the money. And why did Wolves need the money? Because the club had to comply with an artificial construct known as financial fair play. So Wolves are going skint, yes? No. There is no suggestion that Wolves are in financial trouble, only that they are failing to meet the rigours of FFP. Wolves’ owners appear to have the money to run the club, and invest in the club, and in fact came up with a pow

Gold standard ground boosts Tottenham's income

The gold standard in European football grounds is the Tottenham Hotspur stadium in north London, a £1bn construction project completed in 2019. Its impact on the club’s finances has become increasingly clear as the effects of the pandemic have faded. Previously, the average fan would spend less than £2 inside the ground on a typical match day, but now that figure is about £16, thanks to new facilities including the longest bar in Europe and an on-site microbrewery. Capacity has gone up from 36,000 at the club’s previous home of White Hart Lane to 62,000.  The new stadium — built on land adjacent to White Hart Lane — has opened the door to a broad range of other events that have helped to push commercial income up from €117mn in 2018 to €215mn in 2022. Last year, Tottenham hosted US singer Beyoncé for five nights on her global Renaissance tour, two NFL matches, as well as rugby games and heavyweight boxing bouts.  Money brought in from football has gone up too. Match day income is

Charlton takeover approved

The long awaited takeover of Charlton Athletic by SE7 Partners from Thomas Sandgaard has been approved:  https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/se7-partners-obtain-efl-approval-for-charlton-athletic-takeover/ Charlton have had unhappy experiences with owners for over a decade, so how this works out will remain to be seen.  There is certainly potential there, but will it be realised? This interview with Charlie Methven gives detail not available elsewhere:  https://thecharltondossier.com/charlie-methven-on-the-record/