Skip to main content

Do recorded attendances matter?

It is no great surprise to learn that published attendances do not reflect those in the ground. Many clubs report attendances on a 'tickets sold' basis which includes season ticket holders which is perfectly legitimate. However, the figures for different clubs are certainly interesting Attendances

Football finance expert Rob Wilson believes publicising 'tickets sold' attendance figures is done for commercial reasons. He says publishing higher attendance figures could 'potentially bring in better sponsors' and generate more interest in season ticket sales by making them appear a 'scarce resource'.

Historic attendance figures are rarely reliable. There were ways of sneaking into grounds that were far less secure than today. It was alleged that some gatemen were involved in fiddles to benefit themselves or friends. Clubs often depressed attendances to reduce their 'entertainment tax' liability which was easy enough to do when almost all transactions were in cash.

Even today there are a lot of uncertainties relating to attendances, for example how does one treat complimentary tickets? Some people are entitled to them, e.g., match sponsors or the referee who gets them for his mum. Indeed, I once saw someone I know at a non-league match whom I would not have expected to see at any football match. It turned out that the lino was her boy friend and she was admiring his action with the flag.

The interesting question for me is why are fans so interested in attendances? In part it is because claims to be a 'big' club are based on attendances. Falling attendances may be seen as a vote of no confidence in the owners.

At Charlton it has been claimed by fans with some justification that reported attendances have been inflated, possibly to help facilitate the sale of the club. However, given that owner Roland Duchatelet is bent on austerity measures it could be counter productive as my recollection is that the Football League claims an attendance based levy on clubs.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Red in Ramsgate12 September 2018 at 05:12

    The levy is based on receipts - the club has to break down the official attendance but no club would inflate the receipts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wyn Grant12 September 2018 at 05:16

      Thanks for that clarification which is very helpful.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fulham requires big funding from owner

After lengthy delays, Fulham’s shiny, new Riverside Stand has finally opened, creating “a unique Thameside destination with first class facilities for supporters and partners on match days, as well as for the wider community year-round”. This ambitious project has increased Craven Cottage’s capacity by around 4,000 to 29,600, while it has also taken advantage of the club’s fantastic location and wealthy catchment area by including two Michelin star restaurants, a rooftop swimming pool, corporate hospitality and event space, all benefiting from views of the Thames. Chief executive Alistair Mackintosh observed, “Fulham is the sort of club that can have a business class or first class and have fans that turn left on a plane.” Indeed, there is also an exclusive members club – with a football season ticket as an optional extra. It’s fair to say that “the times they are a-changing”, as this is a long way from the traditional pie and a pint. However, in a world where clubs face the tw...
Post a Comment
Read more

Threat of financial calamity removed from Baggies

West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
1 comment
Read more

A poor financial record, but new hope at Everton

I recently saw an amusing video online in which a group of Everton fans were rebuked in jest for being hopeful.  Football fans in general tend to swing between excessive optimism and excessive pessimism, but for many it seems that moaning is in their bloodstream (Spurs fans probably take the trophy).  However, Everton fans have had plenty to moan about on and off the pitch.   Let’s hope that a new era is about to begin for this grand old club. Everton’s 2023/24 financial results covered a fairly momentous season, when they ended up 15th in the Premier League, though they would finished three places higher if they had not received an 8-point deduction for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). It was a worrying time for Everton fans, as the club faced a “perfect storm” of issues, including large financial losses, an ever increasing debt burden, a challenging stadium build and the tortuous sale of the club. There were eve...
Post a Comment
Read more